Posted on 06/28/2006 4:30:33 PM PDT by Momaw Nadon
SALEM — In a paranormal public hearing last night, dozens of psychics argued before a city licensing panel about what the future holds if Salem cracks down on rogue clairvoyants.
Unfortunately, no clear vision emerged from the meeting.
One side told councilors the city needs to embrace its standing as the Witch City by allowing more licensed psychics. But opponents warned that oversimplifying the process could bring predators bent on making an easy dollar, rather than ethically telling fortunes.
The debate unfolded before a hearing of the City Council's licensing committee, which is pondering tightening its regulation of Salem's fortunetelling businesses.
The city now issues licenses to four shops, which can then license five individual psychics apiece. Yet some believe their trade is being unfairly singled out.
"They don't restrict the number of pizza parlors," said Christian Day, a local witch who runs a psychic fair in October. "... I've never heard of a psychic getting pulled over by the police because they were using their intuitive talent to determine whether to go left or right," Day said, pointing out that psychics operate within the law, like any other business.
Acquiring a license means submitting to a criminal background check and paying a $25 fee. And many unlicensed soothsayers are working in the city now.
But setting up a psychic shop in Salem shouldn't be as easy as registering at City Hall, said licensed reader Cynthia Pelletier.
"If somebody wanted to open a liquor store just because they felt like it, the city wouldn't let it happen," she said.
And allowing more psychics into the city could mean an influx of readers keeping a closer eye on the bottom line than on a customer's stars, some said.
"You hold a person's life in your hands," said the Rev. Barbara Szafranski, the owner of Angelica of the Angels. "Sometimes people come to you on the verge of collapse. If you have an untrained individual doing readings, you're bringing down the city, you don't bring it up."
But licensed reader Doug Johnson said the current licenses are too restrictive — they prevent psychics from performing readings at more than one location.
And Day said there's a citywide trend to "de-witchify" Salem.
Salem police Lt. Andre Ouellette, the investigator for the Salem Licensing Board, wants police to have more authority to go after readers who aren't licensed.
"Twenty years ago, anyone could come in and read, and it was a fiasco," Ouellette said. "We had home invasions because people were fighting among themselves."
Ouellette said police often get reports from psychics being threatened by other readers, including one recent allegation where one was forced to perform a sexual act to keep his job. He said police routinely receive reports of business scams, where psychics offer to remove a curse in exchange for a hefty fee.
"Everybody wants to come to Salem to become a reader because that's the place to be," Ouellette said. "But if you open it up to 10 more, they're going to want 20."
If nothing else, the evening revealed a deep split among the city's psychics.
"What I see here is a group of people that should be in harmony, not disharmony," said Linda Weinbaum, a licensed psychic. "... We all should be sharing in the ecstasy of helping people throughout the world."
This should not have been a surprise to any psychic who was any good...
when psychics are outlawed only outlaws will have psychics.
I've never been to a psychic or fortuneteller.
But, I'm against licensing of psychics.
What's next, licensing of churches?
Maybe they're only peripheral visionaries, like Stephen Wright........and why doesn't the psychic on the hot line know my name when I call?
Exactly what is the difference between a rogue clairvoyant and an ethical fortune teller? A license?
Time to form a union to control unregulated workers.
Amalgamated Witches of Salem sounds about right to me.
Hey, I could have told them that.
"Rogue" clairvoyants? They must be the ones who tell you "lady,I don't have the foggiest idea what the future has in store for you".
Is that what we used to call Gypsies in a less enlightened time?LOL
Good point.
How does the government distinguish between a legitimate psychic and a charlatan? Sould there be a test? What would the criteria be?
This is clearly a case of government overstepping its bounds, and is most probably not Constitutional.
Yeah, I saw that one coming, too.
Did you ever wonder why you never see help wanted ads for phsycics? The psychic hotlines require a lot of psychics, 3 shifts, 24/7/365, to man all the phones, and yet you never see a help wanted ad for all those thousands of job positions.
What I think is, the psychics just *know* where the job openings are and just go there.
So didn't any psychic see this coming?
Interesting name for a witch.
Sould = Should
If the city is going to license them, then they will be accountable for all frauds.
What is their litmus test for licensing?
I saw this one coming. Didn't AlGore invent the Tarot card deck just before he invented the internet?
I have no idea. That's an interesting question.
The article then goes on to say:
"The city now issues licenses to four shops, which can then license five individual psychics apiece."
So, should the city then restrict the number of churches or the number of priests each church can have?
Psych me up those five lottery numbers and I'll vote however they tell me.
The power to tax is the power to destroy.
If they're real psychics, shouldn't they already know what the future holds?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.