[Czar]

"When our government is concerned, Constitutional questions, has an interest thereof, or if not already in a case, will enter by filing an amicus brief, and request court time to argue. The Court record show, the U.S. Solicitor General did neither, in fact remained absent and silent. Therefore to protect the public's interest, our paid government lawyers avoided any input to save the eminent domain clause of the Fifth Amendment."

And some wonder why the federal government is distrusted.

They no longer merit the public trust.

[Smartass]

You're right about the word trust.
IMO, there's way more to why the U.S. Solicitor General purposely ignored, and stayed away from Kelo v. City of New London immanent domain then we're being told.   A year later, the recent meaningless EO doesn't mesh with the intent of 04-108, or in fact the U.S. government isn't even mentioned, because they don't practice it. The EO is really misleading!

Appointed U.S. Supreme Court Justices judges, should never have the authority to usurp, or rewrite our Constitution without being pulled on the carpet, or to be taken to task.   The Court's role is to be guardians of the Constitution, and to safeguard government intrusion on the public, and instead, not to legislate or redo it by a five man fiat.