You're right about the word trust.
IMO, there's way more to why the U.S. Solicitor General purposely ignored, and stayed away from Kelo v. City of New London immanent domain then we're being told. A year later, the recent meaningless EO doesn't mesh with the intent of 04-108, or in fact the U.S. government isn't even mentioned, because they don't practice it. The EO is really misleading!
Appointed U.S. Supreme CourtJusticesjudges, should never have the authority to usurp, or rewrite our Constitution without being pulled on the carpet, or to be taken to task. The Court's role is to be guardians of the Constitution, and to safeguard government intrusion on the public, and instead, not to legislate or redo it by a five man fiat.
Agree completely. Of course, they've been doing it for so long by now they're almost on autopilot.