Sorry bud.
What you describe as 'evolution being observed' is not *uniquely* supportive of evolution to the exclusion of all other explanations. That's the key point that evos don't understand. The evidence must *uniquely* support evolution before it's *not* metaphysical.
And if you see a virus that isn't 'resistant to antibiotics', you give me a call. You don't even understand that all viruses are unaffected by antibiotics.
And the 'coded information' argument you present is lame. It is based on the prior existence of a replicating coding system. It doesn't explain how such a system arose. Can you not see that?
Glad you cleared that up for us. It is now obvious how ignorant you really are.
That's usually how it goes w/ evos, though, and is why they present so few arguments. They really don't understand 'evolution' and quickly degenerate into psychobabble that is devoid of content and ignorant of basic biological reality.
As you demonstrate, evolution is totally metaphysical. You have all your facts wrong, yet still believe.
There is no need to go further in your post. Name another scientific theory that explains Evolution.