More scientists express doubts on Darwin

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | June 22, 2006 1:00 a.m. Eastern

[VadeRetro]

Then there's that "religious horror" thingie, the idea that you might go to Hell for learning the wrong idea.

[Jorge]

I wouldn't say my resume is "dazzling" as there are plenty of very smart and accomplished people on both sides of this debate.

I have just come to the conclusion that creationists are correct on this, and will come out on top ultimately.
Wait and see.

[js1138]

Waiting 203 years and counting...

[VadeRetro]

Your posts remain unresponsive where it counts.

It's always this way.

[Radix]

"Waiting 203 years and counting..."

You been around here that long?

Pray tell, what does that refer to in order that I can go read a book and smash it?

[js1138]

Try reading some history of science.

[Jorge]

Your posts remain unresponsive where it counts.

Probably because as the author I decide what "counts" when it comes to my responses and not you.
I don't expect you to fashion your posts to meet my requirements either.

[js1138]

Actually, I am thinking of William Paley's Natural Theology. I'm off a year, depending on when you start counting.

It was Darwin's favorite book in college and the inspiration for Origin of Species.

[Jorge]

Waiting 203 years and counting...

God is patient. Not willing that any should perish.

[Radix]

"Try reading some history of science."

I'll just toss out my Biology notes, my Micro notes, My A&P notes,and then engage on an exploration of what the heck happened in 1803 that you consider to be so important.

All because you can't answer a simple question.

[RunningWolf]

I am not saying the entire run would be there (I think you know that) but say 2 to 4 laps of it. This would have been late 20's for me and I was in extremely top physical condition 5'9" and 148lbs then, I was not bulked out but very well conditioned.

All of my runs were at nighttime in early-late spring of those years. During the parts of the runs where I got into the high speed cruise, your body is springing along like a gazelle, the breathing is aligned with the running. It became a flowing meditation.

But now my left knee hurts, and I just know my lungs and the rest of the body would 'say not' also. Even POTUS BUSH who is close to our age gave up the running a while back.

Well Take Care,

W.

[Radix]

Chucky was a pretty nice guy.

He hesitated to post his Theory on the "Origin of Species" until he recognized that other people could also read, and were ready to publish their own observations.

It was a matter of weeks in the end concerning who got the credit for the completely discredited notion that Evolution is a fact.

Non sequitor.

What happened 203 years ago that caused your post remark?

I am just curious!

[js1138]

check out 1008.

[RunningWolf]

But see 'you guys' are taking an analogy (Goo to you, via the zoo) and making it into a straw-man and then you might even insert it yourself if 'the opponent' does not, while at the same time 'the other side' is supposed to automatically interpret your analogies correctly.

When I don't see those sort of things going 50-50 I guess thats one part that draws out the defensive negativity in my posts. Its more to the dynamics of the threads than any greater arguments-debates.

See from my POV, what the reality is will remain ultimately remain an unknown and beyond man. If I am to be attacked on anything attack me on that.

Now does that mean I try to compete against 'you guys' with pixes and fairies ?? NO!! and why should anyone suggest so, if not but a reflection upon them?

While this post is to you Vade, its not about you per se, but more an overall observation to one piece of the crevo debate dynamics.

Wolf

[Radix]

OK, I'll go Googling in order to figure it all out.

Meanwhile, I am running out of time here for doing new research and posting on it.

Not complaining mind you, just noting publicly, that I have more important things to do with my suspect intellect.

[Jorge]

Don't worry about it.
No need to get down an dirty with the opponents. Years of experience have shown that to be useless.

You are on the right side of this debate and will be proven right. I have total confidence in that fact.

[Maurice Tift]

I was really hoping that we would settle this entire debate tonight!

[VadeRetro]

Having peaked and started over the hill at 35, I currently summarize my condition as "21 years and 30 pounds added."

[VadeRetro]

An analogy IS a strawman if you don't know the real basis of the "analogy" and cannot describe the situation at all without "analogy."

[js1138]

I think it is settled. Some people think they can overturn hundreds of years of established science without even knowing what it is they are arguing about.

If you can't state your opponent's position, you lose the debate by default.