$12 Million
$70 Million
Posted on 06/17/2006 4:34:55 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
SACRAMENTO - One year after California joined the multistate Mega Millions lottery game, sales have fallen short of expectations and the new game has cannibalized some sales of the existing Super Lotto program. Combined sales of Super Lotto Plus and Mega Millions tickets are likely to reach about $1.2 billion this year, short of the $1.4 billion projected when California joined the 11-state game in June 2005, said California Lottery acting director Joan Borucki.
"I think it's (because of) that initial start-up period that you have with a new product and getting your customers to feel comfortable with it and even recognize that it's available," Borucki said. "And maybe some error on our part that it didn't pick up as quickly as we would have liked."
The previous year, sales of Super Lotto alone were almost $1.1 billion. This year, Super Lotto is down to about $720 million, while Mega Millions is expected to come in around $460 million.
That means Mega Millions cannibalized some sales of the existing Super Lotto program as expected, but brought in enough of its own sales to add at least $80 million to overall lottery revenue.
But lottery officials remain convinced that joining the game was a good move that is paying off for education.
About 34 percent of lottery funds are supposed to go toward schools, or about $370 million from Super Lotto and Mega Millions this year.
Including other lottery products, such as scratch-off tickets, overall lottery sales were almost $3 billion as of April 30, meaning the lottery is on track to transfer more than $1 billion to California schools this year.
Mega Millions has also survived a serious legal challenge in its first year. Gambling opponents joined with some supporters of increased education funding to file a lawsuit in Sacramento challenging California's authority to join a multistate lottery and its implementation of the program.
But the judge ruled in favor of the state earlier this month, with the caveat that lottery officials work out some discrepancies with the other states over how much time winners have to claim their prizes.
Attorney Nicholas Roxborough of Woodland Hills, who represents the California Coalition Against Gambling Expansion, said his clients aren't likely to appeal the ruling, but might ask the Legislature to examine ways to get more lottery funds provided for education.
In particular, he suggests the lottery consider a cap on prizes, with the remainder going to education.
"Why do you need a more than $100 million prize pool?" Roxborough asked. "I think people will play whether it's $100 million or $200 million. At some point, why keep it growing exponentially?"
But Borucki said it is the growing prize pool that creates the most excitement in the public and generates substantially increased sales.
The slow start by Mega Millions, she said, got a significant sales boost after a $315 million jackpot was claimed in November from a ticket sold in Anaheim shared among seven people.
Any jackpots over $100 million tend to have a similar effect, she added.
At the same time, there are already several bills pending in the Legislature to revise the funding formula for the lottery.
Sen. Dean Florez, D-Bakersfield, has proposed a bill that would increase the percentage of lottery revenue that goes to schools to 45 percent, up from the current 34 percent.
Borucki said the lottery would like to be able to provide more funds for education, but she argued that decreasing the prize pool has been shown to be self-defeating in other states, where it reduced lottery sales overall.
"The entire goal of this organization is to make as much money as we can for education," Borucki said. "There's a combination of ways to do that. But it all comes down to selling the product. ... Telling people that they're going to receive less in payouts isn't going to help me sell my product."
Assemblyman Gene Mullin, D-San Mateo, has authored a bill to target the Mega Millions funds toward specific school programs.
His bill would distribute the funds based on schools that have the most special-education students, English-language learners and low-income students.
While the distribution formula would be based on those needs, the schools are not required to spend the funds specifically on those programs.
If approved, the bill would create a measure to be placed on the November ballot for voter approval.
Some education groups, such as the California Teachers Association, oppose the Mullin bill because they don't believe distribution of the money should be restricted by a weighted formula.
Aside from the issue of whether the state should sanction gambling, the education community generally has mixed feelings about Mega Millions and all lottery games, noting that while they provide more money for schools, the funds are generally less than the public assumes and in the past have served as an excuse to reduce other funds for schools.
In the current fiscal year, the state budget for K-12 education is about $61 billion, with about $1 billion of that coming from the lottery.
"Although the lottery money has helped education, sometimes it's a double-edged sword," said CTA spokeswoman Sandra Jackson. "There are those times you talk to people about the need for increasing funding for education and they'll say, I thought the lottery did that. Why do we need to give education more money?
"What they don't realize is the money given to education is not a significant amount when it comes to money per student or per classroom."
HEY! That's my Mom's pension you are talking about :-)
Helluva way to fund a gummint.
If you only play a couple bucks at a shot, you could consider it entertainemnt, otherwise it's just a voluntary tax on those bad at math
No wonder some kids slide thru school, they know they have a shot to hit the big one when they come of age.. yup, preying on one gullible and eager group of folks to benefit another group who could care less. The people who make the money are the middle men and the gubamint.
A mob-like operation yet "legit". and I'm not just saying that becuz I have never hit the big one, mind you. ;-)
$12 Million$70 Million
That said I usually - but not always- play 2 bucks a week on the powerball. If I miss playing I don't freak out like some folks I know.
What I'm waiting for is the HUGE disappointment that will come when the gambilng in PA finally gets up and running. Everybody here has the >expected< revenues spent 5 times already, and the best part is it isn't gonna happen. NOBODY is going to come to places like Pittsburgh to play casino slots. The revenues will all come from the >already strained and meger< discretionary money the residents here have.
And they're the ones who are expecting to reap a windfall from state sponsored gambling via reduced taxes. When all is said and done they'll be worse off than before and lots of mom and pop places, local taverns and such , who support their business via illegal gambilng will be out of business.
The next few years are going to be very interesting in PA. It very well could spell the end of the rat and rino boys in Harrisburg, and pave the way for a conservative takeover.
prisoner6
I play only when the jackpot gets large -- I think Powerball is at $100M or so right now -- I might think about buying a ticket at $200M.
Why not play a couple of bucks a week? The year before last on a two dollar ticket I hit five grand. At that point it was a windfall. I put the money in my safe and saved some of it for Christmas, the rest I used for bills. I had the the store I bought my ticket at, save all the looser tickets for me and when tax time came, the entire pot was all mine. Feeling guilty? --- not at all. This past year by plaing six bucks a week, have collected two grand. Tax on stupid????? My daughter loves the bike I bought her. To play the way some people play......well... not me. I have been lucky, but not stupid.
Six bucks a week is still entertainment level. $40 a day is hardcore addict level. I see lots worse getting my coffee in the morning!
What's an FOE?
I rarely drink away from home, way too much risk, and i can't smoke anywhere anymore. Screw it, i cook better than restaurant crap anyway.
Admitting to what seems to be felony tax fraud on the public Internet where you are traceable and not anonymous would seem to me to make one feel a little guilty.
she'd be stupid not to do everything she can to reduce the fed gov't sponsored paycheck rape.
she'd be stupid not to do everything she can legally to reduce the fed gov't sponsored paycheck rape. Claiming fraudulent gambling losses is stupid.
That said, all lottery proceeds should be immediately rebated back to households with children below the federal poverty guidelines to use as vouchers to send their children to private or parochial schools, which would kill off or improve public schools.
I could use $200 million.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.