Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paladin2
It's all a little unclear when reviewing the text of the verbal interchange. It does seem that the reporterette was referring to the MM and W was essentially calling them vigilantes (in the armed, enforcing sense).

No it doesn't seem that way. The Minutemen patrol wasn't even on the border yet. And more to the point the President didn't even make an accusation.

There's a difference between a specifically directed accusation of vigilantism and a general denouncement of potential vigilantism.

253 posted on 06/18/2006 9:34:19 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]


To: FreeReign
The rep0rterette asked ab0ut "th0se pe0ple" - m0st likely the MM.

Bush didn't answer the questi0n.

Since the discussi0n was "live", it d0es say s0mething that W ch0se t0 use the l0aded w0rd "vigilante" in resp0nse. It's clear that by n0t directly answering the questi0n, he's 0ff the h00k by direct qu0tati0n. His th0ughts c0me clearly thr0ugh th0ugh.

It's very likely that W believes in his heart that the MM ARE vigilantes. By his acti0ns, we can c0nclude that W d0esn't really believe that this is a nati0n 0f laws wrt illegal immigrati0n.

0ne is left t0 draw 0nes 0wn c0nclusi0ns, but I think that 6 years 0f inacti0n speaks v0lumes. The vigilante thing is just icing 0n the cake.

255 posted on 06/18/2006 10:19:00 AM PDT by Paladin2 (If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson