Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreeReign
The rep0rterette asked ab0ut "th0se pe0ple" - m0st likely the MM.

Bush didn't answer the questi0n.

Since the discussi0n was "live", it d0es say s0mething that W ch0se t0 use the l0aded w0rd "vigilante" in resp0nse. It's clear that by n0t directly answering the questi0n, he's 0ff the h00k by direct qu0tati0n. His th0ughts c0me clearly thr0ugh th0ugh.

It's very likely that W believes in his heart that the MM ARE vigilantes. By his acti0ns, we can c0nclude that W d0esn't really believe that this is a nati0n 0f laws wrt illegal immigrati0n.

0ne is left t0 draw 0nes 0wn c0nclusi0ns, but I think that 6 years 0f inacti0n speaks v0lumes. The vigilante thing is just icing 0n the cake.

255 posted on 06/18/2006 10:19:00 AM PDT by Paladin2 (If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies ]


To: Paladin2
Bush didn't answer the questi0n.

You are right, Bush didn't answer the question.

Given that there were no arrests up to that point and given that the President couldn't guarantee that there would be no future vigilante actions, as chief law enforcement officer it would be inappropriate for Bush to answer the question in the following two ways;

Regarding vigilantism at the border, LE has one task. Arrest and prosecute anybody who has committed a vigilante act.

Since there hadn't been any arrests and since the President can't predict the future, instead of answering the setup question, the President went on to do his job and say what he wanted to see at the border and what he didn't want to see at the border.

BTW, is your keyboard br0ken?

257 posted on 06/18/2006 10:53:29 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson