Posted on 06/16/2006 7:48:00 AM PDT by pabianice
New positions opening up every day.
Hey, having a force "over the horizon" is surely the best way to fight terrorists on the other side of the horizon right?
< /uber sarcasm >
They're being wiped out? Obviously on the endangered feces list.
Now, I wonder why the militant socialist media would miss this story. It doesn't fit the agenda, I guess. By soem lights in the MSM, that means it's not true. Right, Dan?
Tell the Liberals ya can't win if ya don't play...
bookmarked
I'm so proud of--and grateful too--our military warriors. Heroes, every one of them!
The only way the Dims can win is if we cheat the way they accused Bush of cheating!
No one will vote for the Dims, except a few radical wing nuts.
This major news cannot be surpressed for long.
They appear to have not learned much from Comintern. What kind of revolutionaries did they expect to be? Example of what to not do?
"This was to be done by starting rumors of American atrocities, and feeding the media plausible supporting material. Al Qaeda's attitude was that if they could not win in reality, they could at least win imaginary battles via the media."
Aren't most battles in the MSM imaginary?
Good article and great news!
"....Other documents stressed the need to manipulate Moslem and Western media. This was to be done by starting rumors of American atrocities, and feeding the media plausible supporting material...."
....and some of our boys are sitting in prison in leg-irons.
The US media is scum.
Yes, the capture of Zarqawi is not important and I did have those boys put in irons. The troops need persecution and I am here to lead the democratic party in doing it.
/Sarcasm OFF
Bravo Sierra. I heard the interview with the Iraqi PM. There will be no amnesty for those who killed Coalition forces. "BAGHDAD, June 15 -- Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's office on Thursday accepted the resignation of an aide who had told a reporter that Maliki was considering a limited amnesty that would likely include guerrillas who had attacked U.S. troops, the aide said."
I must take exception to this statement:
"This would weaken the United States, and put the hurt on Iran, an arch-enemy of al Qaeda."
That is just not true. The Iranians and the Zarqawi wing of AQ may not have liked eachother, but Iranian support for AQ has been documented for years. It was first discussed in "Breakdown" by Bill Gertz. Then the September 11th Commission Report detailed Iranian ties to and support for Al Qaeda. Two recent books by Richard Miniter and Curt Weldon also provide indications of Iranian cooperation with Al Qaeda.
"As repugnant as it may be to you, would you agree the end result of a pacified country with mostly full Sunni participation worth the heavy insult to your warriors and their families?"
I say we swallow hard and accept that result, knowing that while they may be bragging, deep down in their hearts they are very relieved they won't face this ending.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTJnMRRe5Xc&mode=suggested&search=
(Warning - very disturbing for the weakhearted)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.