Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BJClinton

You said -- "Not at all FRiend. Let's talk scripture on a science thread. Specifically, what does the Good Book say about self-righteousness?"

I would refer to Ann Coulter's book (and chapter...) on the "grieving widows" for a starter. And then I would say that no amount of talk about "self-righteousness" is going to silence me on talking about the Bible (and neither should it silence *anyone* else).

That kind of "self-righteous talk" is exactly the same type of "ploy" that Ann Coulter is talking about -- but in the political arena. She says it's specifially designed to "shut off talk" so that you cannot respond. That's precisely the nature of any questioning about "self-righteousness"

The fact of the matter is that the Bible says to proclaim it's Word -- high and low, throughout the entire world, in all places, in all situations, at any time. The Apostle Paul did it. The rest of the Apostles did it. We're to do it.

I don't even have to be concerned about it (any issue of self-righteousness) -- in the least -- because I'm not proclaiming the "righteousness of self" -- but rather -- the "righteousness of God and of Jesus Christ".

Perhaps some people legitimately miss this particular point. Perhaps some people think this is a proclamation of "self-righteousness". If so, then that's a perfect example of *how misled* they are on the "Gospel" and what it means. They -- then -- have *no concept* of what the Gospel of Jesus Christ is -- according to what the Bible tells us and what Jesus Christ has done for us.

And in *this particular case* -- of this thread -- it's *certainly* appropriate, in context with the origins of the universe. And it's certainly appropriate in the context of what the Bible says, in that "God has chosen the foolish things of the world to put to shame the wise." It fits *exactly* in with origins and with context (how smart and/or wise) the person is (along with our society).

It couln't be more appropriate if one tried to make it so.

So, sorry, I don't only invoke the Bible here, I also invoke "Ann Coulter".

Regards,
Star Traveler


134 posted on 06/15/2006 12:22:46 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]


To: Star Traveler
HB posted his admiration for Professor Hawkins awesome understanding of science. Amongst your long-winded cut-n-paste dump of scripture was this:

Professing to be wise, they became fools

Kinda rude, no?

So let's break this down. We have a thread about the world's leading physicist, you quote scripture inferring he's a fool and your grand point is?

God is smarter?

You win the "No-S**t-Sherlock Post of the Day" award on that one.
139 posted on 06/15/2006 12:56:34 PM PDT by BJClinton (There's plenty of room for all God's creatures, right next to the mashed potatoes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

To: Star Traveler
All we are saying is...

If there was a thread in the religion section that highlighted a particular priest or apostle, I would not wonder over there and start mouthing off scientific theories or quantum chromodynamics.
But alot of your cohorts deem it necessary to do the same thing to scientific threads.
142 posted on 06/15/2006 1:50:44 PM PDT by HOTTIEBOY (I'm your huckleberry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson