Replies

One thing I would like to know from you, how exactly could you EDUCATE me on this huh? Were you there? Does your kid go to that school? Because unless you live in that town and your kids goes to that schoo, you don't know anymore about this than I do, so shutee

I did something most here didn't. I actually read all of the emails between the school and Mr. Parker. I read the police report. I read the interviews with both Parker and the school officials. In other words, I didn't just depend on anti-homosexual web sites for my information.

If you are there, and your kids does go to that schoo, then that means that you are likely one of the parents who doesn't mind a queer agenda book being force fed to six and seven year olds who are TOTALLY not psychologically developed enough to comprehend anything homosexual in nature.

Do you even know what was in the book? I would have told the school I did not want the book sent home. Apparently Parker was the only parent who did not get the information that the book would be sent home. Strange isn't it.

By the way, I thought you didn't want to talk to me anymore?

Again, all of your arguemnt is flawed because the school was refusing to obey state law! Why can't you understand that? The school violated state law by refusing the parents the right to opt Jacob out of the homosexual material, which is insane to expose a six year old to in the first place. And this happened at the start of this, and everything Mr. Parker did was in response to this school breaking the law, which gave him the right to opt his child out of gay material. From that point forward, you can't charge Mr. Parker with a crime, without charging the school with a crime, because the school broke the law first, and any laws that Mr. Parker broke were in retaliation to the school taking away his parental rights, and breaking state law, and the police did not enforce state law, which makes them culpable also. Again, the rest of your argument is flawed and illogical because you continue to refuse to recognize these facts, which started the whole situation. All following events wouldn't have happened if the school had obeyed state law which demanded that parents have authority to opth their children out of offensive materials.

And I don't enjoy talking to you but I can't just let you misrepresent the facts of this matter. The school broke the law, and charging Mr. Parker with breaking any law after that point is hypocritical and ignoring the fact that the school violated the law first, and the police ignored it, which forced Mr. Parker to take to measures he would have never have had to if the school had simply obeyed state law, which Governor Romney re-enforced with his public comments which were totally in support of Mr. and Mrs. Parker. Do you have some gay agenda you believe should be pushed on kids or something? Because you seem bent on twisting this to be Mr. Parkers fault and ignoring the fact that the school clearly and willfully violated state law and denied the parents their rights as parents of their child. Those are facts in evidence and not open to interpretation. It's black and white and very clear.