To: sirchtruth
"Ok, I'm not going to disagree, but just asking businesses not to sell a book is perfectly within the rights of Free Speech from anyone. It may be asinine in this case, but founded on pure constitutional precepts."
I agree with you completely about that. It was my understanding that these were legislators calling for an actual ban. However, if they are just using the word "ban" when calling for a boycott, then they are perfectly within their rights, just incredibly stupid.
130 posted on
06/11/2006 10:26:28 AM PDT by
piytar
To: piytar
they are perfectly within their rights, just incredibly stupid.Agree, unless Ann Coulter is giving them a cut for the extra publicity!
134 posted on
06/11/2006 10:27:31 AM PDT by
ahayes
("If intelligent design evolved from creationism, then why are there still creationists?"--Quark2005)
To: piytar
However, if they are just using the word "ban" when calling for a boycott, then they are perfectly within their rights, just incredibly stupid.That's what I think. Although, I consider what they are doing is asking bookstores not to carrying or offer the book for sale.
150 posted on
06/11/2006 10:39:53 AM PDT by
sirchtruth
(Words Mean Things...)
To: piytar
The problem is that we're not talking about just a couple of citizens here- we're talking about government officials. Technically, they have the right, but it's the type of thing a government official should refrain from doing anyway. There's a much thinner line between public statements and government policy in this case- anyone who genuinely believes in free speech should be careful of starting a very bad precedent.
163 posted on
06/11/2006 10:54:59 AM PDT by
Sofa King
(A wise man uses compromise as an alternative to defeat. A fool uses it as an alternative to victory.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson