Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

A local Girl who went to Purdue, then to San Francisco, then returned home.

Let's Freeper her back to the stone-age

1 posted on 06/11/2006 6:44:35 AM PDT by Military family member
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
To: Military family member
Not important? Wrong priorities? Bigger Problems?

~~horsehockey~~

If this is/was the case, why are they willing to co-opt every civil rights struggle ever conceived to get their way?

2 posted on 06/11/2006 6:48:48 AM PDT by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Military family member

agreed


3 posted on 06/11/2006 6:50:44 AM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Military family member
In addition to being straight, I am a practicing Christian. If somebody managed to prove tomorrow that God does not exist, I would go on using Jesus as my guide.

Sounds more like a practicing Unitarian.

4 posted on 06/11/2006 6:54:55 AM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Military family member
Don't look now Stephanie ... but anyone who so vigorously defends the gay lifestyle as being just like anyone else's does have a gay agenda.
6 posted on 06/11/2006 6:58:21 AM PDT by JustaDumbBlonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Military family member

Typical liberal bromides of ignorance, hatred and fear.


7 posted on 06/11/2006 7:01:52 AM PDT by satchmodog9 (Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Military family member
The past decade has been about the "specialness" of the gayness of being 'gay'. Now that the separateness of the gayness has been established they are going to claim similarity and sameness? H E L L O!!!!
8 posted on 06/11/2006 7:02:05 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Military family member
Let's Freeper her back to the stone-age

Yeah, let's not bother to shoot down what she said. Besides we all know she's just another liberal trying to confuse our convictions with facts.

9 posted on 06/11/2006 7:02:10 AM PDT by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Military family member

>How many times did he speak about it, make certain his
>disciples were clear on the subject, construct a parable for
>the masses so they could grasp the significance of it in
>their lives?

>Zero. None. Never.

Have you not read that from the beginning the Creator 'made them male and female' and said, 'For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh'? So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore, what God has joined together, no human being must separate."
Matthew 19:4-6

1) man shall be joined to wife
2) not three, not four or more, but *two*


10 posted on 06/11/2006 7:16:28 AM PDT by ROTB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Military family member
Denying two adults the legal, social and economic benefits that come with a state-sanctioned union is flat-out, unequivocal discrimination.

Any adult man and adult woman are free to marry and will have the same legal, social and economic benefits as any other adult man and adult woman who choose to marry.

Every single adult Salter knows can fit into and benefit from this equation. If they choose to.

They don't choose to. They choose to arbitrarily rewrite the underlying biological imperative of marriage and force the rest of us to accede to it.

13 posted on 06/11/2006 7:24:27 AM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Military family member

The story had many errors. I've done the necessary editing.




I’m rarely lifted by some occurrence under the Capitol dome, but 48 members of the Senate provided an exception this week: They spared us the protracted and dangerous distraction of a federal battle over interspecies marriage.

That even five minutes was spent on this issue — let alone all the words poured out about the need for a constitutional amendment to “protect” marriage — illustrates how far our nation is from getting its priorities in order and its act together.

You know, the act we need to perfect so we can seriously deal on the global stage with real political, economic, security and environmental threats to our well-being?

Now, before some of you rev up the e-mail and phone trees — the ones that tell me in 25 formulated words or more that I should go back to San Francisco where all those Beastialites flout their abomination before God and country — I have a few things to say that might save you the trouble.

No. 1: I have no “beastiality agenda.” I am a lifelong intraspeciessexual, born and raised in Indiana, who developed my advocacy for beastial rights here in the heartland. The first bestial person I knew I met in high school through the 4H Club.

During my four years at Purdue — a stand-up, state-supported university chock-full of white-bread kids like me — I got to know many more bestial women and men. I learned at an early age that bestialsexuals are people who are much more like intraspeciessexuals than they aren’t.

We laughed at the same jokes, danced to the same music, struggled similarly through farming 101 or English lit, worried equally about our post-graduation employability and made sure we got home for our parents’ birthdays. Sometimes, late at night, as we shared a beer or a walked through a few cow pies, we confided the same personal dream: to love and be loved.

So, don’t blame San Francisco. I equated bestialsexual rights with human rights long before I left Indiana.

No. 2: As Farmer John, maker of fine weiners, can and will tell you, truly knowing and loving a goat or cow of either gender makes you look at discrimination against beastialsexuals in a whole different way.

Denying and adult and an animal the legal, social and economic benefits that come with a state-sanctioned union is flat-out, unequivocal discrimination. Deliberately meting out injustice — with a constitutional amendment, no less — won’t protect the institution of marriage. But it will eat away at the democratic, egalitarian values that made this country different from any other on Earth.

The preamble to the Declaration of Independence says Americans have certain inalienable rights — among them life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness — that are endowed by our Creator. Which brings me to my next point.

No. 3: In addition to being intraspeciessexual, I am a practicing Christian. If somebody managed to prove tomorrow that God does not exist, I would go on using Jesus as my guide.

So, how important was the issue of bestialsexuality to Jesus? How many times did he speak about it, make certain his disciples were clear on the subject, construct a parable for the masses so they could grasp the significance of it in their lives?

Zero. None. Never.

Of all the statements attributed to Jesus, not one includes interspecies sleeping arrangements. If bestialsexuality is such a threat to humankind’s communion with God, wouldn’t you think his son might at least have mentioned it?


What is most important to God is no mystery. Over and over Christ said to take care of the poor, to visit the sick and imprisoned, and to take care and love our barnyard friends. He told us to be quiet about our charity, not advertise it, and to ignore class, ethnic, and species barriers and be good Samaritans to all in need.

Lest we be so thick-headedly human and forget, in Matthew, Mark and Luke he drew a line under and around his top priorities: “This is my first commandment: Love God with all your heart and soul and mind. And love your farm animal as yourself.”

In John, he made it sublimely simple: “This is my commandment: Love one another as I have loved you.” Period. No exceptions for goats.

No. 4: In the three decades I lived in San Francisco, I got to know lots more bestial men and women. They were my neighbors, my co-workers, my fellow parishioners, my elected leaders, my dear friends.

Some of the bestial couples I know have been together for most of their adult lives. Many have children, both human and animal upon whom they dote, over whom they worry and for whom they provide, plan, and with whom they dream of living life on a farm someday.

Like millions of Americans, these committed beastials earn a living, pay their taxes, borrow money to fix up their homes and pens, take medicine for their hypertension, see their veterinarian regularly, watch “Survivor,” cash in air miles for vacations, volunteer their spare time, walk their dogs and, once in awhile, surprise their longtime partner with a romantic visit to a pasture after all the years.

What exactly in that behavior is dangerous to marriage? The heterosexual U.S. divorce-marriage ratio is 1-to-2. When is the last time you heard anybody cite “bestial Americans” as the reason their marriage busted up?
The only thing that will protect the institution of marriage is more good marriages. If we really wanted to reinforce and defend marriage, we as a society would go after the real enemies of healthy, responsible, respectful relationships. And we would say, “Hooray!” to any couple willing to commit themselves to a life together.

Then maybe we could get on as a people — and a government — with combating bona fide abominations.

You know, abominations such as ignorance and fear? Prejudice and poverty? Waste, greed, hunger, war and — the ultimate abomination, according to Jesus — hatred? It is ba-a-a-a-a-d.

Stephanie Salter can be reached at (812) 231-4229 or stephanie.salter@tribstar.com


14 posted on 06/11/2006 7:26:01 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Military family member
Let's see if we can make her more honest: I equated gay degenerates' rights with human rights long before I left Indiana. With that one correction, her agenda to degenerate society down the toilet bowl she prefers becomes evident. Liberalism (the girl's ailment) is a disease in need of eradication before it kills the Republic.

BTW, degenerate minds don't consider the institutions of civilization worthy of protection because degenerate minds want most to refashion civilization into their degenerate utopia. This heterosexual degenerate journalist is no exception.

18 posted on 06/11/2006 7:44:07 AM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Military family member

isn't it nice how the young brainwashed can decide for the majority of the world population


21 posted on 06/11/2006 7:54:38 AM PDT by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Military family member

anyone that has access to a muslim forum should post this story to it


22 posted on 06/11/2006 7:55:30 AM PDT by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Military family member
If you look at what marriage originally was, it meant that if you convinced a woman to go into your tent, cave or hut, then you were bound to her and took care of your children etc... The entire concept of marriage only makes sense if you are referring to a man and a woman. Two guys aren't bonded just because they were messing around with each other.

Gay marriage is nonsensical because two men cannot have sex. Human reproduction doesn't match up male to male. Gays can simulate sex and can simulate marriage. But to say they can marry is like saying 2 + 2 = 5. It still equals 4 even if the state says its 5.

It really has nothing to do with Judeo-Christian morality or the church or societal conventions. Marriage was established long before those things existed. It can't be redefined just because someone doesn't like the biological basis of it.
24 posted on 06/11/2006 8:12:04 AM PDT by Dialup Llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Military family member

It's called "Incrementalism."

Creeping totalitarianism telling all that unless homosexuality is accepted and applauded in the public, private and religious square in all its forms and permutations, nothing less will do.


26 posted on 06/11/2006 8:30:36 AM PDT by OpusatFR ( ALEA IACTA EST. We have just crossed the Rubicon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Military family member
Steph....

Bottom line: Engaging in same sex is "abnormal" sexual behavior! Why not help them overcome the abnormal attraction rather than succumb to the abnormal behavior of same sex -- just as we do for all other abnormal sexual attractions and their chosen behaviors?

Opposition to the gay agenda is NOT hatred of gays. It is loving them enough to tell them the truth and to help them overcome the "abnormal" sexual attraction they've been burdened with -- Christ calls them to do just that!
27 posted on 06/11/2006 8:37:52 AM PDT by dcnd9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Military family member

"You know, the act we need to perfect so we can seriously deal on the global stage with real political, economic, security and environmental threats to our well-being?"

The family is a foundation of our society and thus essential to the real political and economic security of our nation... without the family, we are but 20 years from barbarism.

Now, we can discuss intelligently whether or not redefining maarriage, which has been one man and one woman throughout western civilization's rise, will negatively impact this institution, but to call this important debate a 'distraction' is pure bunk. The US Senate, whose usual business is pandering to special interests, has many lesser issues to deal with, but few issues of more importance.


29 posted on 06/11/2006 8:41:13 AM PDT by WOSG (Do your duty, be a patriot, support our Troops - VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Military family member
When is the last time you heard anybody cite “gay Americans” as the reason their marriage busted up?

Arriannia, what ever her name is,Huffinton and what ever his name was.

35 posted on 06/11/2006 8:53:50 AM PDT by org.whodat (Never let the facts get in the way of a good assumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Military family member

Next time you hear a liberal ranting against evangelical Christians, write down what they say, then read it back and substitute the word "Jew" for Christian. I did that with a friend and she was shocked to hear how much she sounded like a bigot. It was the first time she knew how her words would come across to a conservative.


36 posted on 06/11/2006 8:54:14 AM PDT by GOPJ (Hang zarqs by his feet in the center of Baghdad and put a NYTimes in his hand-pissant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Military family member
[ Stephanie Salter: Gays a threat to institution of marriage? Get real ]

Marriage is about children not sex.. being gay is about sex not children, unless children are sexual points of interest..

37 posted on 06/11/2006 8:56:29 AM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson