Canadian Conservative MP Calls Christian Political Activists “Taliban” and “Flowers of Evil”

LifeSiteNews ^ | 5/9/06 | John Jalsevac

[spatso]

But, unlike most of the other countries you have mentioned Canada does not have the toughness to deal with the terrorism file. Nice people but soft. Perhaps I should not change the thread, it is about Canadian conservatives fighting each other over gay marriage. And, the home grown terrorism issue gets pushed to the back burner.

[fanfan]

LOL!

Good night All!

[kanawa]

Nite fanfan..don't let the bilderbergers bite.

[spatso]

And, of all the places this guy could go why has his government dedided to send him to Canada?


Gay Dutch Ambassador Leaves Estonia

THE HAGUE, 07/06/06 - The Netherlands' ambassador to Estonia is resigning due to hostile treatment of his partner. The diplomat is gay and his lover a black man from Cuba.

Ambassador Hans Glaubitz said his Cuban husband could no longer cope with gay hatred and racism on the Estonian streets, evening newspaper NRC Handelsblad reported yesterday. After only one year in office, he will now be moving to Canada to lead the Dutch consulate in Montreal.

Trouble for Glaubitz' partner started after a local weekly had reported shortly after his arrival that his appointment should be regarded as a provocation by the Netherlands. Glaubitz stressed in a personal statement yesterday that the Estonian authorities cannot be blamed. However, its "society is far from ready for two gentlemen, especially when one of them is black."



Close www.nisnews.nl

[Ma3lst0rm]

Oh Yes, disagreeing with the promotion of the homsexual disorder in society is a clear sign that you believe they should be put to death like the case was with the Taliban. Even here that is the mantra of the left that homosexuality is how conservatives win. It is amusing because it is their radical positions and their activist friends that have made the GOP a preferred alternative to their twisted worldview.

[Fair Go]

I think you'll find they are as tough as the rest when the conservative minority government obtains a majority.

[Blood of Tyrants]

anti-marriage, anti-life, anti-Christian Conservative MPs..

Just what is there left to be conservative about?

[Antoninus]

“I have no time for groups in our society who try to force their morals, or their culture, on the rest of us.”

But of course, this guy has no problem forcing his immorality on everyone else...

[spatso]

"I think you'll find they are as tough as the rest when the conservative minority government obtains a majority."

Frankly, I am not sure I have seen anything that offers even a shred of evidence that this may be true. The homosexual agenda is not that big an issue with me. Indeed, the gay mounties and the gay diplomats are really pretty funny, as long as it is some place that really does not matter. But, I think those same issues are reflective of the soft underbelly of Canadian society. If they can't stand up to a minority trying to assert a sexual agenda, how do you stand up to a minority who is planning terror against you and your neighbors.? Let's keep it really simple, all this new stuff has happened under the "new" conservative government. The two guys fighting are conservatives, one may or may not be a cabinet member.
When a couple of guys come on this thread and rattle your cages a little over the homosexual agenda, most of you cut and run. If someone points out the lack of conviction Canadian conservatives have displayed you whine and snivel always saying "it was the other guys fault." Do you not think it is coming to a point where you need to stand up and take some responsibility for what is going on within your own borders?

[Fair Go]

Didn't I hear something lately about gay marriage and the US Senate?

[fanfan]

Spatso,

I read the few posts you've made since you've been here.

Are you perhaps Rev. Phelps?

[spatso]

"Didn't I hear something lately about gay marriage and the US Senate?"

Exactly, you have hit the nail right flush, square on the head. The conservatives in the US Congress are standing up for what they believe. There are lots of liberals who vehemently disagree, but the conservative senators still fight for what they believe in. The Senators are trying to stop gay marriages from becoming legal as a result of judicial activism.
In Canada, gay marriage was made legal by the elected government. In Canada, it appears everyone plays nice. Gay mounties get married, gay diplomats make Canada the country of choice and nobody is offended. The RCMP "supports" the marriage of two officers, "in uniform." The Prime Minister tells his party members they should not be critical of the happy nuptials. Does nobody up there get it? It is a dangerous world and you guys are playing patty cake. If you really are conservative it is time to suck it up and stand up for what you believe in. This is especially true for the government.

[Fair Go]

As I understand it there is going to be a vote on the issue in the parliament. Also, to remain in office the conservatives have to go carefully as they are in a minority and risk being defeated on the floor of the parliament. If this happens they are out of office. This is a different system to the US. Best they proceed carefully and consolidate their position so that they get a majority next election.

[Fair Go]

Good one!

[spatso]

"Are you perhaps Rev. Phelps?"

No I don't hate people and I don't think God hates gay people. I don't even mind gay unions. If two mounties want to live together, fine. But, why does the government endorse it? How can this dispute between two conservatives be so important as the same time as the issue of home grown terrorism comes to the surface? What is it you guys don't understand? Stop making excuses, it is not just the government that is soft on the important issues, it is the mind set of the people that is soft.

[fanfan]

I have to go to work now.

I'll be back later to deal with you, if you're still here.

[GMMAC]

What part of bashing All Canadians for the actions of some is exactly like blaming ALL Americans for the Clintons or Kennedys ... or even Congressman Barney Frank, dammit! ... is it that you refuse to understand ???

See Conservativism 1.01:
"individual responsibility"
"personal accountability"

[Fair Go]

Or all Australians for Germaine Greer or Sir Les Patterson!

[spatso]

"What part of bashing All Canadians for the actions of some...See Conservativism 1.01: individual responsibility,
personal accountability."

Perhaps you are right, maybe I am being unfair and repetitious on this point. But, I think not. I assume that the Prime Minister has the individual responsibility and the personal accountability for this file. So, why has he not stood up and let everyone know where he stands. I think the gay mounties being married in uniform is a thresh hold issue. You name any US service from the Marines or Coast Guard to the postal service and you know GWB would not allow them to wear an official government issued uniform. Even if they got a court order I know that GWB would have stood up and said "I disagree." Your guy seems to be saying, "everybody play nice, no bad comments." And, some of you try to tell me this is leadership. More important, like sheep you all fall into line saying its the other guys fault. So, individual responsibility and accountability starts with you and if you don't like the way the government is handling this file you need to say so.

[kanawa]

How can this dispute between two conservatives be so important as the same time as the issue of home grown terrorism comes to the surface?

We can actually separate and deal with two issues at a time. Hard to believe, eh?

What is it you guys don't understand?

The intelligence and/or motivation of posters
that try to closely link 'gay marriage' and the motivation to fight the WOT
and make sweeping generalizations about their neighbors
but are seemingly blind to what is going on in their own house.

You apparently have little knowledge of what is happening in Canada,
the past history of how 'gay marriage' became legal,
or that the current government will be holding a vote on the matter.

As this article illustrates there is an intense debate going on here regarding 'gay marriage'.
To assume the "people" overwhelming support it and have a 'soft mind set' is ludicrous.