Ann's comments that the women were glad their husbands died, that their husbands were about to divorce them and that they should pose for Playboy before they got too old are disgusting.
I detest the Jersey Girls and everything they stand for, but they have children and how do we think they felt reading/hearing this about their mothers and dead fathers?
I was glad to read that Laura Ingraham and Hugh Hewitt have called Coulter's remarks disgusting, because they were and should be condemned by every right thinking person. Let's not sink to the low of the leftists.
Well, they are using their husbands' deaths for personal gain. Saying they're happy the husband are dead may be over the top, but it's hard for me to feel sorry for such repulsive people.
It's called "satire." Ann uses biting sarcasm to make points.
Her work is not for the faint-of-heart, she sticks it to 'em. My guess is the reaction of the women and the politicians is the over-reaction of the guilty-at-heart.
in what context did she actually 'state' the stuff?
Her comments may be disgusting, but can you tell us how they are not true?
These women are using 911 to foward their own agendas thus their husbands deaths were the vehicle for their fortune and fame.
You may not like it, but it is true.
Perhaps they should have thought about that before they agreed to become shills of the anti-war Left. They have said the most vicious things about President Bush, including repeating the slander that he allowed 9/11 to happen for his own purposes.
Once you cross a line like that, you're fair game. If you don't want your children to hear nasty things about you in the press, don't cross that line.
But this business of the Left using spokesmen who cannot be countered because they are "untouchable" has to end. Coulter is practicing the time-honored technique of finding the biggest bully in a bar and punching him square in the nose. She'll be in for a heck of a fight, but people will give her some room at the bar.
This is AMERICA and people have the right to speak their minds,and you have the right not to buy her book.
I agree. Coulter has a good point that the Jersey Girls should not be exempt from criticism when they try to use their status for political purposes and for advocacy of a debatable point of view, but unfortunately she undermines the point by going too far with the ad hominem stuff.
O'Reilly had her stutterin' and stammerin' today as he suggested that she might have used some more temperate language. She accused him of "insulting" her when he suggested that she decided to go after the Jersey Girls to sell books.
The irony was delicious: Coulter accusing someone of insults. Her vitriol got the best of her with this latest attack, and she has truly crossed a line that, while she will sell lots of books in the short term, will cause her to be viewed as in the same fringe as Michael Weiner.
Coulter is Coulter. Not for those folks who are easily offended by over the top hyperbole. As far as I'm concerned, once they start spouting like moonbats in the political arena, they are fair game for derision.
Hugh Hewitt has never been a Coulter fan, and those who have read and enjoyed her wit, are not likely to see this as over the line. When she said "let's invade their countries and convert them to Christianity", the polite class gasped in horror. Ann's fans cheered her on.
I don't whine when people hammer Nancy Pelosi's looks, Michael Moore's treason, or for that matter Coulter being a desparate transvestite.
We need someone on our side who will fight in the gutter with the gutter-dwelling, treasonous libs and spit in their face. Ann's the one.
"I was glad to read that Laura Ingraham and Hugh Hewitt have called Coulter's remarks disgusting..."
Not true Laura wasn't thrilled with the remarks, but I don't recall hearing the word "disgusting".
And the Jersey Girls should have thought about what their kids might hear before they opened their vile anti-American mouths. They absolutely have the right to say any mindless or evil things they want to say, but they must be prepared to deal with verbal challenges. Freedom of speech isn't just for them.
Which makes the actions of their Mothers in the Bush Delirium Syndrome soap opera even more contemptible.
There have been countless opportunities for our side to: (I'm just going to quote jebeier in #46 becasue he summed it up pretty good)
"Get in and attack the Left for using spokesmen who cannot be countered because they are "untouchable".
Coulter is practicing the time-honored technique of finding the biggest bully in a bar and punching him square in the nose. She'll be in for a heck of a fight, but people will give her some room at the bar."
No one has done so until now.
She's a brave soul to go into this "no mans land" knowing she'll be shot at from not only the other side, but by many on our side too.
She's truly a heroine for going where no one has dared to go before.
If anyone is going to but a stop to the Left's dispicable practice, it's going to be Ann. In spite of the many on our side who are trying to stop HER, not the lefties
I would need to read them in context. Do you have a direct quote?
I have nothing but contempt for Breitwiser and Co.
My favorite Fat Bottomed Girl is beneath contempt.
You don't get it Peach. You still don't get it.
When Ann Coulter wrote, and I quote: "And by the way, how do we know their husbands weren't planning to divorce" she was not lying - she was asking a question.
You are falsely accusing Coulter of lying - in other words you are lying yourself about what Coulter wrote.
So please, stop lying.
Thank you for a voice of reason in a sea of undeserved Coulter adolation. I share your disgust over the vile comments Ann has made this time out, and from other responses I've gotten, many freepers feel the same.
I admit that the children here are innocent but their media whore mothers deserve every word Ann says.