Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dhs12345
Seriously, people are on welfare are at the lower end of society -- moms with 12 kids, drug addicts, etc.. Not sure how reliable they would be as workers.

I have to disagree with the absolutes. There probably are people like that on welfare, I'd imagine. But don't you think there are also some invaders who came here for jobs but ended up with many kids and on welfare?

I would submit that US citizens could be found to do most any job, if it didn't involve exploitation, low salaries, no benefits and no opportunity to move up.

FWIW, back in 1997, substitute teaching and tutoring paid more, with more respect, than it does now. What hurt that? Why, whole bunches of wives of workers in tech here doing those computer jobs "Americans wouldn't do".

Baby boomers are retiring. It's a group in which many like doing things like gardening, babysitting, laundry, etc. Between that, and students, and training programs for non-employed US citizens, one can't help but suspect that these jobs would be filled. Those employers would just have to get used to paying minimum wage, giving decent conditions, and having employees who could speak their language and expected respect.

28 posted on 06/08/2006 12:28:13 PM PDT by grania ("Won't get fooled again")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: grania

Agreed.

And it will correct itself one way or another.

Especially, if illegals are given an opportunity to become legal. Amnesty -- no! New or improved process -- yes.

Because, the pool of dirt cheap labor will be gone. Dirt cheap labor drives down wages. Very low wages are unattractive to most Americans.


40 posted on 06/09/2006 9:11:17 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson