I don't understand this logic on immigration. If people cant accept a Pence like compromise in the House then I am beginning to wonder the end game here with that group. I have noticed a slight change in the debate here and elsewhere. At the start it was only being against illegal immigration. Now the anti legal immigration forces are being more open in what they believe.
The end game is to do nothing and then to bitch and moan for another 40 years.
Please provide proof of this unsubstantiated accusation.
Of course, we do have a vested interest in making sure legal migration is in the interests of our country. I had to prove (to the nth degree) that I could pay for my wife when she came here on a K1 Visa.
Nowadays, we let anyone in, even if they will be instant welfare recipients and spreaders of TB, Rubella, polio and other hitherto-thought-removed diseases.
Is this what you mean by "anti legal immmigration forces?"
So what is your stance on illegal alien law breakers?