Skip to comments.
The Federal Marriage Ammendment: Unnecessary, Anti-Federalist, and Anti-Democratic
Cato Institute ^
| 01 June 2006
| Dale Carpenter
Posted on 06/04/2006 1:41:05 PM PDT by Lorianne
PDF document, can't cut and paste
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: cato; federalism; fma; homosexualagenda; libertarians; nannystate; samesexmarriage; statism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 last
To: Alberta's Child
Can't argue with that.
However, given the reality of the current sitaution, and the move to define marriage as something other than it is, such an amendment, if it got the required support and passed muster, would, by definition, be constitutional.
61
posted on
06/06/2006 10:08:59 AM PDT
by
Jeff Head
(www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
To: Alberta's Child
I think the best way to solve this problem is to get rid of, sooner rather than later, these idiot judges and replace them with strong constitutionalists who would hold up the constitutional laws and strike down the unconstitutional ones, rather than pretending that state Consitutional amendments are verboten just because they uphold "traditional" marriage.
62
posted on
06/07/2006 6:29:26 PM PDT
by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(One flag--American. One language--English. One allegiance--to America!)
To: Lorianne
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson