Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reversal of Earth's Magnetic Field-(Hey Algore read this)
Projects in Scientific Computing ^ | N/A | Gary Glatzmaier, Los Alamos National Laboratory

Posted on 06/03/2006 7:00:13 AM PDT by ThreePuttinDude

Rush made mentioned this week of a core sample that showed evidence of tropical remains from an Arctic sample. Here are the results of a similar study done by a federally funded organization that claims this has been happening for........ever.

Simulated three-dimensional structure of Earth's magnetic field, with inward (blue) and outward (yellow) directed field lines. Field lines extend two Earth radii from the core. The location of the core-mantle boundary is evident where the structure becomes complex


TOPICS: Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: algore; algorewatchout; climatechange; godsgravesglyphs; gps; magneticfield; magnetism; manbearpig; poleshift
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: pabianice

>>What bullshit. Magnetic compasses have been in use for 600 years and in that time the Earth's magnetic north pole has barely moved. By this "reasoning," magnetic north would have by now moved to Korea.<<

This is established science that the poles reverse. The frequency is in debate.


21 posted on 06/03/2006 7:59:07 AM PDT by gondramB (We may have done a lill' bit of fightin amongst ourselves but you outside people best leave us alone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
What bullshit. Magnetic compasses have been in use for 600 years and in that time the Earth's magnetic north pole has barely moved. By this "reasoning," magnetic north would have by now moved to Korea.

My reaction too. We do have to correct Magnetic North to True North (and visa versa), and the correction factor changes enough so that charts don't print the correction factor on them lest they become obsolete. So the field is changing, but massive projections as to when the field will reverse, when the change seems slow, irregular, and un-uniform seems unwise.

22 posted on 06/03/2006 8:00:27 AM PDT by RhoTheta (If you find yourself in a fair fight, you didn't prepare properly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave
Impending doom inded....when the Van Allen belts collapse we will all be fried by intense solar radiation.....enjoy the sun-tan.

Well, according to the medical profession, we'll all be OK if we just use enough sunscreen. SPF 45,000?

23 posted on 06/03/2006 8:01:35 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RhoTheta

See posts 10 and 11.


24 posted on 06/03/2006 8:09:52 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Nope. This is a real theory. that's why there is a TRUE north and MAGNTEIC north. It's called the Angle of Declination, and it most DEFINATELY changes.


From : http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2003/29dec_magneticfield.htm

"Scientists have long known that the magnetic pole moves. James Ross located the pole for the first time in 1831 after an exhausting arctic journey during which his ship got stuck in the ice for four years. No one returned until the next century. In 1904, Roald Amundsen found the pole again and discovered that it had moved--at least 50 km since the days of Ross.


Sign up for EXPRESS SCIENCE NEWS delivery
The pole kept going during the 20th century, north at an average speed of 10 km per year, lately accelerating "to 40 km per year," says Newitt. At this rate it will exit North America and reach Siberia in a few decades.

Keeping track of the north magnetic pole is Newitt's job. "We usually go out and check its location once every few years," he says. "We'll have to make more trips now that it is moving so quickly."

Earth's magnetic field is changing in other ways, too: Compass needles in Africa, for instance, are drifting about 1 degree per decade. And globally the magnetic field has weakened 10% since the 19th century. When this was mentioned by researchers at a recent meeting of the American Geophysical Union, many newspapers carried the story. A typical headline: "Is Earth's magnetic field collapsing?"

Probably not. As remarkable as these changes sound, "they're mild compared to what Earth's magnetic field has done in the past," says University of California professor Gary Glatzmaier.

Sometimes the field completely flips. The north and the south poles swap places. Such reversals, recorded in the magnetism of ancient rocks, are unpredictable. They come at irregular intervals averaging about 300,000 years; the last one was 780,000 years ago. Are we overdue for another? No one knows. "

The magnetic pole is shifting all the time. For my location, in Oregon it is : Declination = 17° 7' E changing by 0° 9' W/year. From the site : http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/seg/geomag/jsp/struts/calcDeclination
The Field DOES flip. It will happen again. We just have no idea of when it will happen again.
25 posted on 06/03/2006 8:14:35 AM PDT by Danae (Anál nathrach, orth' bháis's bethad, do chél dénmha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave
"Impending doom inded....when the Van Allen belts collapse
we will all be fried by intense solar radiation.....enjoy the sun-tan"

Calling Admiral Nelson!!!

26 posted on 06/03/2006 8:14:38 AM PDT by trickyricky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude

Maybe if Michael Moore moved to Tierra Del Fuego, this 1200 year thing would speed up?


27 posted on 06/03/2006 8:20:12 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (My donation to the GOP went here instead: http://www.minutemanhq.com/hq/index.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

The compass needle was in use during the Trojan war.


28 posted on 06/03/2006 8:21:39 AM PDT by RightWhale (Off touch and out of base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

I believe during a reversal, worldwide you'd expect eventually several hundred thousand additional human deaths from cancer.

In the grand scheme of things, irrelevant, out of 5 billion people, though it obviously sucks if you're one of the unfortunate several hundred thousand.


There's no evidence of any animals...reptiles, birds, mammals...having mass die-offs during past reversals.


29 posted on 06/03/2006 8:24:01 AM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude

It's that Karl Rove at it again!!


30 posted on 06/03/2006 9:01:08 AM PDT by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude

That was a sarcastic joke.

I always post that pic on junk science/apocalyptic hysteria threads....:)


31 posted on 06/03/2006 9:12:35 AM PDT by Salamander (Cursed With Second Sight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: metmom

"Well, according to the medical profession, we'll all be OK if we just use enough sunscreen. SPF 45,000?"

Oh God.
I'm gonna *really* freckle when it happens.


32 posted on 06/03/2006 9:16:15 AM PDT by Salamander (Cursed With Second Sight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude
To the consternation of our desire to understand what's happening inside the planet we live on, Jules Verne's Journey to the Center of the Earth is still fiction. There's no way to penetrate 4,000 miles to Earth's center, nor to monitor fluid motions or magnetism in the outer core.


33 posted on 06/03/2006 9:21:03 AM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("fake but accurate": NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Well, according to the medical profession, we'll all be OK if we just use enough sunscreen. SPF 45,000?

I'm just planning to stay inside for the rest of my life.

34 posted on 06/03/2006 9:29:07 AM PDT by mhx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude
How do we know if the dynamo theory is right?

Earth's mag field is produced by the atmosphere.

35 posted on 06/03/2006 9:29:43 AM PDT by RightWhale (Off touch and out of base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae

This was the post I was looking for. I was trying to explain this to a guy who said "They have no way to prove the earth is more than 6000 years old." Actually, they do. Thank you so much for posting it.


36 posted on 06/03/2006 9:31:48 AM PDT by Excellence (Since November 6, 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude; SunkenCiv

Bump for later reading. Ping for possible GGG List


37 posted on 06/03/2006 9:39:27 AM PDT by Nowhere Man (Greystone, I'll miss you (5-12-2001 - 4-15-2006) RIP little buddy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

BS yourself. The long-term changes in magnetic north have been well-documented for decades. Magnetic north is changing as we speak -- just compare some old aeronautical charts with the new versions.


38 posted on 06/03/2006 9:40:14 AM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude

A year or so ago, PBS ran a very compelling special on the magnetic pole shift, how it happens, how possibilities increase....all with full-color charts and graphs and a very impressive retinue of bigtime scientists at various bigtime universities. I'll see if I cna find a link.


39 posted on 06/03/2006 9:44:24 AM PDT by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Magnetic compasses have been in use for 600 years and in that time the Earth's magnetic north pole has barely moved.

Magnaetic declination is a phrase familiar to anyone depending on a magnetic compass for route finding or surveying before the advent of GPS. It's the difference between magnetic north and true north. It varies with location and time.

The declination as well as rate of change at point of use needs to be known to get an accurate direction of geographic north. The rate of change may also change. A straightforward explanation with examples can be found here if you're interested.

For more exotic possibilities of "North", see here, here, and here .
40 posted on 06/03/2006 9:46:01 AM PDT by caveat emptor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson