Posted on 05/26/2006 6:29:23 PM PDT by voletti
LONDON: Killing British Prime Minister Tony Blair in a suicide bombing would be morally justified as revenge for the war in Iraq, firebrand lawmaker George Galloway has said. In a magazine interview that was widely reported on Friday, the MP for the anti-war party, Respect, was asked if it would be justifiable for a suicide bomber to blow up Blair provided there were no other casualties. Galloway told GQ magazine: “Yes, it would be morally justified. I am not calling for it - but if it happened it would be of a wholly different moral order to the events of July 7.” He was referring to the London attacks last year, when four Islamic extremists killed 52 people and themselves by bombing the transport network. “It would be entirely logical and explicable,” the leftist lawmaker said. “And morally equivalent to ordering the deaths of thousands of innocent people in Iraq - as Blair did.” Galloway said he would alert the authorities if he learnt of a plot to kill the prime minister - but only to prevent generating “anti-Arab” propaganda. “Such an operation would be counter-productive because it would just generate a new wave of anti-Arab sentiment whipped up by the press,” he said. “It would lead to new draconian anti-terror laws, and would probably strengthen the resolve of the British and American services in Iraq rather than weaken it. So, yes, I would inform the authorities.” Galloway said he would rather see Blair brought to trial for war crimes than killed because innocent civilians would also likely die in such an attack. His remarks immediately sparked a storm of protest. MP Stephen Pound, of Blair’s governing Labour Party, told The Sun tabloid newspaper: “These comments take my breath away. Galloway is disgraceful and truly twisted. “Every time you think he can’t sink any lower he goes and stuns you again. It’s beyond reprehensible to say it would be justified for a suicide bomber to assassinate anyone.” Galloway, who formerly belonged to Labour but now represents his own left-wing Respect party, is no stranger to controversy. afp
I say that they should thrown this butthole in jail.
Disgusting...
far left creep.
Galloway says murder of Blair would be 'justified'! (SICKO ALERT!)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1638696/posts
Galloway: Blair's death would be justified
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1638939/posts
Police urged to investigate Galloway over 'Blair assassination' interview
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1639096/posts
I say arresting this idiot for threatening the Prime Minister would be justified.
better yet-
see him being interviewed gun at temple a la jazeera
what an fool.
no fool alike an old fool
better yet-
see him being interviewed gun at temple a la jazeera
what an fool.
no fool alike an old fool
The UK won't do anything about it.
Help, someone please help put this freakshow out of his misery for good!
Putting Galloway away for a long, long time is morally necessary. What a buffoon. Does he think that being a good Dhimmi will save him?
as he speaketh , I pray that be his own fate .
The failure to see Galloway properly hung for treason is coming back to bite Blair, I see.
bump...
Shouldn't this guy be tossed in the klink or something? I know if someone here made the same crack about President Bush, the Secret Service would certainly come in and ask a few questions at least. I know if a couple of cases like that. I remember one guy I talked to on a dialup BBS back in 1988 where he made a crack (he was for Dukakis & Bentsen) about Bush 41 and Quayle when they both came to Pittsburgh about eliminating them both "with a grenade" and "doing the country a great service" he was detained by the Secret Service until they found out he was joking. I also remember in 1992 soon after Clinton got elected, one guy called up KDKA-AM and said that he (Clinton) "would not live to the end of his first term" the host of the time, John Cigna, was taken back by that and the next day said the Secret Service requested the tape of that call.
Of course, the first case was a joke and the second, well, I dunno, but I've heard of this Galloway guy and he is very serious on this so why ain't he in the hoosegow? I'm sure the UK has similar laws on the books about threats like we do in the U.S.
murdering galloway is morally justified and probably alot of fun.
Galloway "...MP for the anti-war party, Respect, was asked if it would be justifiable for a suicide bomber to blow up Blair provided there were no other casualties. Galloway told GQ magazine: “Yes, it would be morally justified. I am not calling for it - but if it happened it would be of a wholly different moral order to the events of July 7.” He was referring to the London attacks last year..."
"...a wholly different moral order..." !?!?!? How many arbitrary "moral orders" are there to justify or rationalize what is NOT moral? (Other than the communists' inverted moral codes) According to Natural Law: for every extreme action there is an opposite extreme reaction. Galloway invites extreme thoughts about zapping him for his HATE SPEECH. At least the Brits also suffer insane and inane politicos.
Respect magazine interviewed MP Galloway-anti-war party and asked if it would be justifiable for a suicide bomber to blow up Blair provided there were no other casualties. Galloway told GQ magazine: “Yes, it would be morally justified.
Wow, I read this and wonder what the press has to be hit with for them to call a dangerous liberal psychopath exactly what he is.
***I'm not sure that "journalists" should make a diagnosis of "psychopath". Respect's interviewer certainly asked, or baited Galloway with, a provocative question. Galloway's answer exposed himself (with a hate-speech WAR CRY) as a pyschopath. I KNOW of a "different moral order" that will justify tossing Galloway into a stirring hive of manic muslims.
Treason.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.