Replies

Here is one item you posted that was a quote. It clearly does not relate to the topic, but is a just a standard disclaimer.

"THE COUNCIL TAKES NO INSTITUTIONAL POSITION ON POLICY ISSUES AND HAS NO AFFILIATION WITH THE U.S. GOVERNMENT. ALL STATEMENTS OF FACT AND EXPRESSIONS OF OPINION CONTAINED IN ITS PUBLICATIONS ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR OR AUTHORS."

Now we argued over whether the CFR is affiliated with the US Government. Clearly government employees and politicians who are members of the CFR have an affiliation with them. Clearly many many employees of the government are members of the CFR. So can they really say they have no affiliation with the government? I don't think so.

Another poster asked you if the CFR has no position on creating the North American Community, why don't you see a CFR member producing a paper with the opposite opinion? Why is it that when you kick open a globalist beehive, a zillion cfr members come buzzing out?

"Here is one item you posted that was a quote. It clearly does not relate to the topic, but is a just a standard disclaimer."

Do you know why I posted that quote? Would you like to review why I posted this quote that "clearly does not relate to the topic"? Because in your post #521 you said..."The CFR is a globalist secret organization that makes policy recommendations and is comprised of many members of the US Government" Of course you offered zero support, and you certainly didn't offer any evidence from the document you supposedly want to discuss point by point. So I took a DIRECT QUOTE from the document WE ARE DISCUSSING (or at least one of us is) and offered specific evidence supporting my statement that you are wrong.

Now you say a quote from the document you want to discuss point by point is "off topic"? What topic ARE you discussing?

"So can they really say they have no affiliation with the government? I don't think so"

Back to this point? OK. Then I guess you accept the CFR is also affiliated with the NFL, the NBA, Disneyland and Sesame Street.

"Another poster asked you if the CFR has no position on creating the North American Community, why don't you see a CFR member producing a paper with the opposite opinion?"

Maybe there is no interest in isolationism outside of Pat Buchanan. They also haven't sponsored committees on Anti-Zionism and the benefits of slavery.