Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hedgetrimmer
"Here is one item you posted that was a quote. It clearly does not relate to the topic, but is a just a standard disclaimer."

Do you know why I posted that quote? Would you like to review why I posted this quote that "clearly does not relate to the topic"? Because in your post #521 you said..."The CFR is a globalist secret organization that makes policy recommendations and is comprised of many members of the US Government" Of course you offered zero support, and you certainly didn't offer any evidence from the document you supposedly want to discuss point by point. So I took a DIRECT QUOTE from the document WE ARE DISCUSSING (or at least one of us is) and offered specific evidence supporting my statement that you are wrong.

Now you say a quote from the document you want to discuss point by point is "off topic"? What topic ARE you discussing?

"So can they really say they have no affiliation with the government? I don't think so"

Back to this point? OK. Then I guess you accept the CFR is also affiliated with the NFL, the NBA, Disneyland and Sesame Street.

"Another poster asked you if the CFR has no position on creating the North American Community, why don't you see a CFR member producing a paper with the opposite opinion?"

Maybe there is no interest in isolationism outside of Pat Buchanan. They also haven't sponsored committees on Anti-Zionism and the benefits of slavery.

727 posted on 05/22/2006 4:25:36 PM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 723 | View Replies ]


To: Rokke
I posted "The CFR is a globalist secret organization that makes policy recommendations and is comprised of many members of the US Government"

See? I crossed out the word secret.

Maybe there is no interest in isolationism outside of Pat Buchanan.

Ah, now I am disappointed in you. To toss out the boring old pat Buchanan aspersion is beneath you. I was having fun, and now....

Here is a little game I play sometimes. I substitute the word Independence when I see people use "isolationist". It its technically more correct.

Maybe there is no interest in isolationism independence outside of Pat Buchanan

See ? This statement is more correct, given both Clinton and Bush's recent comments about interdependence. They clearly have no love for the Independence that was once bred into the American soul.
742 posted on 05/22/2006 5:32:25 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 727 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson