I have never given any indication that suggests I haven't. Instead, I have given you direct quotes from the document referenced with page numbers. And instead of asking questions about the document whose answers are clearly found within its first pages, I have been forced to copy and paste the answers for you after you asked questions that revealed either zero reading comprehension ability, or the fact that you hadn't read the document in the first place.
If you have really read the whole document now, I expect you won't be asking many of the same questions you asked earlier in this thread, because you already know the answers.
Here is one item you posted that was a quote. It clearly does not relate to the topic, but is a just a standard disclaimer.
"THE COUNCIL TAKES NO INSTITUTIONAL POSITION ON POLICY ISSUES AND HAS NO AFFILIATION WITH THE U.S. GOVERNMENT. ALL STATEMENTS OF FACT AND EXPRESSIONS OF OPINION CONTAINED IN ITS PUBLICATIONS ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR OR AUTHORS."
Now we argued over whether the CFR is affiliated with the US Government. Clearly government employees and politicians who are members of the CFR have an affiliation with them. Clearly many many employees of the government are members of the CFR. So can they really say they have no affiliation with the government? I don't think so.
Another poster asked you if the CFR has no position on creating the North American Community, why don't you see a CFR member producing a paper with the opposite opinion? Why is it that when you kick open a globalist beehive, a zillion cfr members come buzzing out?