Corsi went over the deep end a long time ago.
He certainly does not have access to the President's "secret plans."
The man is nuts.
Oh, not! Not the Coucil on Foreign Relations! Why they're a front for the Freemasons, and the CIA, and the Queen of England. /LaRouch paranoid mode.
Hello everybody.
I'm coo-coo for coca-coca puffs
(1) The actions and words of the Bush Administration on immigration are politically inexplicable. Why is he burning his base? Driving down his poll numbers? Why make Democrat voters out of illegals? Why cavort with Democrats like Kennedy? It hasn't made sense.
(2) Conspiracies don't usually write down their perfidous plots. But geez, that CFR report is downloadable and breathtaking. Please read it before making the tinfoil cracks.
(3) Peggy Noonan knows something about these people. She specultated in yesterday's Opinion Journal:
The other possibility is that the administration's slow and ambivalent action is the result of being lost in some geopolitical-globalist abstract-athon that has left them puffed with the rightness of their superior knowledge, sure in their membership in a higher brotherhood, and looking down on the low concerns of normal Americans living in America.
A geopolitical-globalist abstract-athon, that is the CFR is there ever was one. Superior knowledge? Higher brotherhood? All squares perfectly with a hidden CFR agenda.
(4) Occam's Razor agrees. Bush having a hidden CFR agenda explains everything that Bush has said and done on immigration. If you don't believe the hidden CFR agenda theory, you must make multiple separate explanations for all the inexplicable actions.
This would explain Bush's policy regarding immigration. Otherwise, there is no explanation.
CFR's Plan to Integrate the U.S., Mexico and Canadaby Phyllis Schlafly
July 13, 2005
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) has just let the cat out of the bag about what's really behind our trade agreements and security partnerships with the other North American countries. A 59-page CFR document spells out a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter."
"Community" means integrating the United States with the corruption, socialism, poverty and population of Mexico and Canada. "Common perimeter" means wide-open U.S. borders between the U.S., Mexico and Canada.
"Community" is sometimes called "space" but the CFR goal is clear: "a common economic space ... for all people in the region, a space in which trade, capital, and people flow freely." The CFR's "integrated" strategy calls for "a more open border for the movement of goods and people."
The CFR document lays "the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America." The "common security perimeter" will require us to "harmonize visa and asylum regulations" with Mexico and Canada, "harmonize entry screening," and "fully share data about the exit and entry of foreign nationals."
This CFR document, called "Building a North American Community," asserts that George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin "committed their governments" to this goal when they met at Bush's ranch and at Waco, Texas on March 23, 2005. The three adopted the "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" and assigned "working groups" to fill in the details.
It was at this same meeting, grandly called the North American summit, that President Bush pinned the epithet "vigilantes" on the volunteers guarding our border in Arizona.
A follow-up meeting was held in Ottawa on June 27, where the U.S. representative, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, told a news conference that "we want to facilitate the flow of traffic across our borders." The White House issued a statement that the Ottawa report "represents an important first step in achieving the goals of the Security and Prosperity Partnership."
The CFR document calls for creating a "North American preference" so that employers can recruit low-paid workers from anywhere in North America. No longer will illegal aliens have to be smuggled across the border; employers can openly recruit foreigners willing to work for a fraction of U.S. wages.
Just to make sure that bringing cheap labor from Mexico is an essential part of the plan, the CFR document calls for "a seamless North American market" and for "the extension of full labor mobility to Mexico."
The document's frequent references to "security" are just a cover for the real objectives. The document's "security cooperation" includes the registration of ballistics and explosives, while Canada specifically refused to cooperate with our Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI).
To no one's surprise, the CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries. The burden on the U.S. taxpayers will include so-called "multilateral development" from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, "long-term loans in pesos," and a North American Investment Fund to send U.S. private capital to Mexico.
The experience of the European Union and the World Trade Organization makes it clear that a common market requires a court system, so the CFR document calls for "a permanent tribunal for North American dispute resolution." Get ready for decisions from non-American judges who make up their rules ad hoc and probably hate the United States anyway.
The CFR document calls for allowing Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR document calls for adopting a "tested once" principle for pharmaceuticals, by which a product tested in Mexico will automatically be considered to have met U.S. standards.
The CFR document demands that we implement "the Social Security Totalization Agreement negotiated between the United States and Mexico." That's code language for putting illegal aliens into the U.S. Social Security system, which is bound to bankrupt the system.
Here's another handout included in the plan. U.S. taxpayers are supposed to create a major fund to finance 60,000 Mexican students to study in U.S. colleges.
To ensure that the U.S. government carries out this plan so that it is "achievable" within five years, the CFR calls for supervision by a North American Advisory Council of "eminent persons from outside government . . . along the lines of the Bilderberg" conferences.
The best known Americans who participated in the CFR Task Force that wrote this document are former Massachusetts Governor William Weld and Bill Clinton's immigration chief Doris Meissner. Another participant, American University Professor Robert Pastor, presented the CFR plan at a friendly hearing of Senator Richard Lugar's Foreign Relations Committee on June 9.
Ask your Senators and Representatives which side they are on: the CFR's integrated North American Community or U.S. sovereignty guarded by our own borders.
Ah, NAFTA already includes Canada.
Globalist PING!
I read through the report. It starts out by making many reasonable points, and even a number of good suggestions as long as done within the scope of a sovereign United States working with neighboring countries.
By the end of the report it becomes much more clear that this group does want to undermine the sovereignty of the US.
However, it's not going to be hard to find a few things in such a report that coincide with our administration's policies. That does not mean that the administration ascribes to the group's goals, nor is there any real evidence that the administration does other than it's horrible disregard for enforcing border security and immigration law.
In many ways the report appears to take a harsher stance on those issues, at least for now, and it recognizes that Mexico is not being a cooperative partner.
Even the report recognizes the need for Mexico to fix it's economy before it's desired goal of open legal migration within North America.
It just adds to the amusement value that this idiot seems to think Canada isn't part of NAFTA.
I beleive this to be true. We are using the cheap mexican labor to compete with the cheap chinese labor overseas.
This is common knowledge, ever since NAFTA was passed by a lame duck session of Congress. Our ruling elite wish to create a North American ecomonic zone to compete with EU and China. The USA and it Constitution are toast as far as the ruling elite are concerned. Our new fonding fathers are the Bush family, Clinton family and coporate lawyers. The new law of the land is NAFTA.