Posted on 05/19/2006 6:56:03 AM PDT by Dark Skies
President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.
Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA to include Canada, setting the stage for North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.
President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.
The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:
At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.
What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:
In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.
To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.
The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past.
The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union -- not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated:
The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.
Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be "vigilantes," as he has also said in response to a reporter's question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox.
Why doesnt President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won't do. If a fence is going to be built on our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush protect America's sovereignty, or is this too a job the Minuteman Project will have to do for him?
Good catch!
Well, we know what "loads" you've got, but we're interested in just the facts.
We can review them whenever you're ready.
Or both.
Nope.
"Have you ever been employed by the Bush Administration, the Clinton Administration, or the GWBush Administration for any purpose?"
I've served in the military under all of them, so they have all been my ultimate boss.
"Has your organization ever been granted money by the Bush Administration, the Clinton Administration, or the GWBush Administration?"
The military? Yes. Although not much during the Clinton Administration.
Now, answer a question for me...is this what you consider a factual discussion of the CFR document titled, "Building a North American Community"?
Wrong. Mexico has never sealed our Southern border. Not even for a day.
Yeah, and the Trilateral Commission.
How did the panel that developed this plan get chosen? Is it a secret?
The Immigration and Reform Control Act of 1986 provided a blanket amnesty for almost 3 million illegal aliens in this country. That would equate to "millions" of illegals who poured over our border before 1986.
I concurr.
Yes. And as I've already said...it was a stupid decision. Do you know how many American troops we have there now (and why)? Would you care to guess?
In light of your other posts I'm not quite sure what you're getting at here. The two situations seem like apples and oranges to me for the most part. I don't think we went to war in Iraq to bring them democracy. I think we'll have to wait and see if democracy really takes root and survives there as well. It is a somewhat utopian hope but we toppled Hussein and terrorists moved into the vacuum so we needed to hang in and support some kind of stability there. If forced to fight off barbarians while the locals struggle to get on their feet it only makes sense to encourage a form of government that we feel has stability giving properties.
On the other hand; there is no crisis of those proportions in North America so the need to unite Canada, the U.S. and Mexico in a borderless economic/security cooperative doesn't exist.
Let's hope the crocodiles of denial are right and the CFR is just a club for cigar officianados or recipe swappers. A real attempt to create a borderless union of the three will result in warfare and chaos that will awe the most stalwart Arab feudalist.
Pick a topic related to something in this thread. I'll throw one out for you...The CFR is a secret organization that makes policy recommendations to the US Government. Do you believe that is a fact?
Name one.
Nafta was not created to stop illegal immigration, and was not sold as doing so.
The ministeries you're talking about are simply members of the executive branches of the countries involved such as Elaine Chao.
Some treaties, such as the Law of the Sea treaty I mentioned, are threats to our soverignty-- some are not.
Politicians are people just like you or me. They do not constitute a separate class of NWO members bent only on seeking power.
What you call "being a free trader" is just part of being a conservative. Was President Reagan a socialist? Was the protectionist economist Frederick List a conservative?
First, let me say this is a positive development. We're starting a dialog on the document you wanted to discuss. Now, my answer based on factual data taken from the document itself... No. The document lists each member of the panel (page V) and explains how and why panel members were chosen several times in its opening pages.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.