Posted on 05/19/2006 6:56:03 AM PDT by Dark Skies
President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.
Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA to include Canada, setting the stage for North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.
President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.
The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:
At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.
What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:
In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.
To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.
The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past.
The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union -- not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated:
The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.
Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be "vigilantes," as he has also said in response to a reporter's question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox.
Why doesn’t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won't do. If a fence is going to be built on our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush protect America's sovereignty, or is this too a job the Minuteman Project will have to do for him?
Thanks! With that additional info, I'll keep looking also.
I sifted through the stuff at whitehouse.gov and found nothing.
I'm now looking at these sites
http://www.summitsoftheamericas.org
http://www.summit-americas.org
Don't forget to look into this one too.
http://www.oas.org/
Oh, I ended up there, also. I've given up looking for that exact quote. I was even searching his speeches for the word "paraguas" (umbrella). No luck. But there are plenty more quotes out there that are just as bad.
Now I'm reading about Vicente Fox's background. I didn't know his grandfather was American. Here's some other interesting snips from an old article:
Fox eyes Mexico's presidency Former Coke chief in Latin America could be the candidate to end PRI's long grasp on the office.; [Home Edition]
Susan Ferriss. The Atlanta Journal and Constitution. Atlanta, Ga.: Nov 27, 1999. pg. A.12Vicente Fox could be the star of a Mexican western. He stands 6-feet-4. He speaks in a basso profundo voice. He wears gleaming black cowboy boots. The charismatic politician also is playing a lead role in his country's transition to greater democracy.
A farmer and former executive for Coca-Cola Co. in Mexico, Fox wants to smash 70 years of one-party presidency in Mexico. He campaigns daily with relish, visiting poor and rich, eagerly trying to convince Mexicans to make him the first president since 1929 not belonging to Mexico's omnipresent Institutional Revolutionary Party, or PRI.
(big snip)
Adolfo Aguilar Zinser, an independent senator and sometimes Fox advisor, says the candidate has consulted with American campaign strategist Dick Morris.
Sounding more like a social democrat than a conservative, Fox says, "In Mexico it's more important to distribute income than to create wealth. And our philosophy in that area is we need to make sure we distribute opportunities."
(snip)
VICENTE FOX QUESADA, Mexican presidential candidate
Age: 57 Home: Guanajuato, Mexico; where he was raised on his family ranch. His English surname is from an American grandfather.
Education: Business administration degree from Iberoamericana University, Mexico City. Management degree from Harvard University.
Professional: Rose from route supervisor to president of Coca-Cola in Mexico and Latin America from 1975 to 1979. After that, ran his family's vegetable export and shoe business.
Politics: Joined the conservative National Action Party (PAN) in 1988 and was elected a federal deputy. Ran for Guanajuato governor in 1991, but lost in an election clouded by fraud. Joined forces with left opposition to force the election to be annulled and an interim governor appointed. Elected governor of Guanajuato in 1995. Resigned this year to run for president. He was the only candidate to seek PAN's nomination at a convention.
Proposals: Double Mexico's education budget using oil income. Increase tax revenue collection. Negotiate new phase of North American Free Trade Agreement to include select labor movement. Increase exports. Expand credit to entrepreneurs.
Your earlier reference to the Guanajuato Proposal was also worth a read.
February 16, 2001
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/02/20010220-2.html
Joint Statement by President George Bush and President Vicente Fox Towards a Partnership for Prosperity
The Guanajuato Proposal
That theme, of it being the responsibility of the US to help lift up Mexico (at the expense of US taxpayers) instead of enforcing existing immigration laws was reiterated in the Senate campaign of Rosario Marin. I noted that she was present at the festivities for Fox's visit.
just fyi, I had tried a few days ago, myself, but only your quotes were coming up, Miss American Pie, and I've been called the 'research' genius, lol. But ne'er could I find any sources for your words. These entities like scrubbing, that much I do know.
And as president, he has followed the same model, exporting even more of his paisanos.
bumping this and your linked thread.
Hey, Fox is on CSPAN right now - talking to State Legislators. (from last week)
I posted the full text of Fox's speech on this thread that has transcripts from his visit:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1639071/posts?page=13#13
I got caught up in looking for articles this afternoon. I know I used to go into the ftaa site and pull up just about anything. These articles are on the summit site and no longer available to the public. You have to have a sign-in.
I ran into this site and thought I would post it here.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/cpquery/?&dbname=cp108&sid=cp108fShsa&refer=&r_n=hr401.108&item=&sel=TOC_470693&
For necessary expenses of the United States Agency for International Development to carry out the provisions of sections 103, 105, 106, and 131, and chapter 10 of part I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, $1,385,000,000, of which up to $150,000,000 may remain available until September 30, 2005: Provided, That none of the funds appropriated under title II of this Act that are managed by or allocated to the United States Agency for International Development's Global Development Secretariat, may be made available except through the regular notification procedures of the Committees on Appropriations: Provided further, That $190,000,000 should be allocated for trade capacity building
I am beginning to think we should get Rush, Sean, ORiley or Lou Dobbs to explain some of this "secretariat" business to us. The trade capacity building is number one on the list. So much for "free trade". LOL
Yeah....WTH is a "Global Development Secretariat" that was instituted in the 1960's???? Is that what I'm reading?
(czar and all, see post #1095)
Globalists? Are those the people Henry Ford was trying to describe in a series of articles in the Dearborn Independent from 1920 to 1922? I think he used the term "international".
"Global Development Secretariat"
A secretariat is like a session of congress, I think, which is attended by governmental 'ministers'.
--$5,000,000 for the National Council of La Raza HOPE Fund, of which $500,000 is for technical assistance and fund management and $4,500,000 is for investments and financing as proposed by the House. The Senate did not propose funding for this program;
This is found going to the "hit list" full display on the same url. This is a very interesting page as it tells where all the spending goes. I thought I would look for pork so I went to the bottom of the page after Veterans Affairs, you will find this approximately 1 1/4 inch from the bottom of the page. Someone needs to answer for this. Is it any wonder people were bussed into these marches?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.