Skip to comments.
DRUDGE: BUSH TEAM WANTS PEACE TALKS WITH N KOREA
http://www.drudgereport.com/ ^
| May 17, 2006
Posted on 05/17/2006 6:35:18 PM PDT by Las Vegas Dave
Bush's top advisers have recommended a broad new approach to dealing with North Korea that would include beginning negotiations on a peace treaty, NYT planning to report in Thursday Page Ones... Developing...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: drudge; northkorea
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 181-188 next last
To: sinkspur
I was wondering how long it would take for the mods to nuke him - once I saw what he was all about I stopped responding to him. I think he was asking for it - now he can go over to Clown Posse or LP with his "bones."
To: Cementjungle
The South Korean government is full of leftist appeasers and the press is virulently anti-American. Anti-US demonstrations are not uncommon.
To: ohioWfan
You can't be for real. How can you support peace talks with North Korea? That's insane. Or have we forgotten:
To: Rutles4Ever
To: mnehrling
"Don't underestimate the military minds behind President Bush's actions. Sure, the anti-Bush bots will jump on this.. but how many of them are sitting on their couch guessing while President Bush has the entire Pentagon, NSA, CIA feeding him information and giving him advice..
The strategy behind this may be interesting.... no guesses, but I will give him the benefit of the doubt."
I speculate we want to reassure North Korea they wont be next if they play nice while we attack Iran.
To: ohioWfan
This is a CONSERVATIVE forum, BWHAHAHAHA! You and Madeleine Albright. Unbelievable.
To: Rutles4Ever
Yes. I've forgotten your little red x.
But I'm very much for real in wanting to restore this forum to civil debate, and get rid of the DU trolls who are trying to tear us apart.
127
posted on
05/18/2006 8:01:02 AM PDT
by
ohioWfan
(PROUD Mom of an Iraqi LIBERATION Vet! THANKS, son!!.)
To: Rutles4Ever
Would you care to start making sense?
Thanks, I'd appreciate it.
128
posted on
05/18/2006 8:02:09 AM PDT
by
ohioWfan
(PROUD Mom of an Iraqi LIBERATION Vet! THANKS, son!!.)
To: ohioWfan
I admit, the DU Trolls are getting harder to pick out, but accusing people of being leftists (!) because they think it's daft to even assume that Kim Jong-il is even remotely trustworthy enough to obey a peace accord is breathtakingly blind.
To: ohioWfan
Learn a bit about something called time and/or english.
Logic can be your friend. Kneejerk idiocy is not.
130
posted on
05/18/2006 8:09:27 AM PDT
by
tallhappy
(Juntos Podemos!)
To: Las Vegas Dave
Super!
I am sure this will go as well as his "peace" talks with Russia and Mexico :-)
To: Rutles4Ever
I admit, the DU Trolls are getting harder to pick out, but accusing people of being leftists (!) because they think it's daft to even assume that Kim Jong-il is even remotely trustworthy enough to obey a peace accord is breathtakingly blind.Your statement is correct.
The problem is that I never said that, nor even remotely implied it.
Thanks for explaining politely what you were accusing me of, so I could defend myself.
132
posted on
05/18/2006 8:29:22 AM PDT
by
ohioWfan
(PROUD Mom of an Iraqi LIBERATION Vet! THANKS, son!!.)
To: tallhappy
It's quite interesting that your reply to what I said reveals that you did not actually read it, nor understand it.
I was merely pointing out to you that the person you were replying to was a DU troll...........who is now banned, btw.
I'd appreciate it if you would be more careful to discern before jumping off the deep end to insult me........especially since I was absolutely correct.
133
posted on
05/18/2006 8:34:33 AM PDT
by
ohioWfan
(PROUD Mom of an Iraqi LIBERATION Vet! THANKS, son!!.)
To: ohioWfan
I read your statement. I was referring to your comment of "take it back".
Look in to the concept of time. You'll find it quite interesting and useful.
134
posted on
05/18/2006 8:56:37 AM PDT
by
tallhappy
(Juntos Podemos!)
To: tallhappy
Well since I'm knee-jerk and dense, I'm sure I can never grasp the enormity and depth of your thoughts on 'time,' so there's really no sense it continuing this, is there?
Thanks for trying to help, though.....
(All sarcasm, in case that went beneath your feet.....)
135
posted on
05/18/2006 9:02:37 AM PDT
by
ohioWfan
(PROUD Mom of an Iraqi LIBERATION Vet! THANKS, son!!.)
To: CFC__VRWC
Agreed. I have a army friend that was in Korea. He said South Korea provided little support on the front lines with North Korea. South Korea clearly needs to step things up to defend their own country.
To: pbrown
We're all gonna die!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And all at the same time it seems ;)
To: ohioWfan
I apologize for the misunderstanding.
To: CFC__VRWC
My first thought - maybe this is the opening move toward bringing home our troops in Korea. So we can station them on our own border?
139
posted on
05/18/2006 9:17:12 AM PDT
by
kjam22
To: Rutles4Ever
No problem.......it's easy to have happen.
140
posted on
05/18/2006 9:18:45 AM PDT
by
ohioWfan
(PROUD Mom of an Iraqi LIBERATION Vet! THANKS, son!!.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 181-188 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson