Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Oil Refiners Tell Congress Not Fixing Fuel Cost
yahoo ^ | May 11, 2006 | Tom Doggett

Posted on 05/16/2006 9:01:38 PM PDT by kellynla

U.S. oil refiners are not conspiring to keep gasoline prices high and are not overcharging consumers for motor fuel, the industry's trade group told Congress on Thursday.

Under pressure to do something about soaring fuel costs, President George W. Bush has ordered federal regulators to investigate whether oil companies and refiners are collecting excessive profits from gasoline prices that top $3 a gallon in many parts of the country.

"Allegations of refiner price-fixing, price-gouging and other illegal pricing practices are patently false," Bob Slaughter, president of the National Petrochemicals and Refiners Association, said at a House committee hearing on gasoline costs.

Slaughter told the House Energy and Commerce Committee the refining industry had been subjected to dozens of investigations in recent years by federal and state agencies when gasoline supplies were tight, and in each case the industry was cleared of wrongdoing.

The FTC is scheduled to send Congress a report by next week on the agency's latest probe of high gasoline prices and possible refinery constraints. The report was mandated by Congress last year.

Red Cavaney, president of the American Petroleum Institute, also defended the business practices of its big member companies.

"We condemn price gouging," he told the committee.

The price of crude oil, which in the U.S. market was again above $70 a barrel, accounts for about half the cost of making gasoline.

"Oil companies do not set the price of crude oil," Cavaney said. "It is bought and sold in international markets, and the price paid for a barrel of crude oil reflects the market conditions of that day."

Strong global oil demand, especially from growing economies in China and India, and market concerns about possible future supply disruptions linked to the West's dispute with Iran's nuclear program, were helping to keep crude prices up.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: energy; oil; refinery
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: jonrick46
OOoh....George Noory!

Well, I hate to blow up his shtick, but my sister ISN'T going to marry a Martian. She's already married a Norwegian.

;^)

41 posted on 05/17/2006 9:40:45 PM PDT by SAJ (b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SAJ

Hey pal, what exactly is your problem today? If you're having a bad day, that's fine. But would you take your attitude and your insults somewhere else and please do not post to me again.


42 posted on 05/17/2006 9:45:21 PM PDT by defenderSD (Every rock guitarist I know seems to have an axe to grind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SAJ
I was a corporate financial analyst for eight years, that's why I understand what factors drive decisions to make capital investments. You're just a nut if you think my comments are "ill-informed" or "stupid." BTW, I'm a very successful stock trader and investor. For example, I've recently made over 100% gains on ConocoPhillips and Marathon Oil. I made probably 400% on Microsoft stock back in the 90s. So knock off the personal attacks and insults. Those are against the principles of FR.

BTW, I had a good idea what those two commodity contract symbols meant, but I wanted you to confirm it for me. Of course, with that information you can get to the extra cost of ethanol much faster. Like I said, I'm not a commodity trader, but I still understand the basics of financial analysis in the oil industry.

43 posted on 05/17/2006 9:52:43 PM PDT by defenderSD (Every rock guitarist I know seems to have an axe to grind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

Do you know if Ashland is expanding refining capacities in the midwest?


44 posted on 05/17/2006 9:58:07 PM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD
I've had an excellent day, thank you. Fully profitable in both lumber and rice, as well as in straddles on CME shares. Plus, I was able (took too long, my fault entirely) to convert the old REFCO, Inc. daily equity run printouts to the new Man Financial style, for the local office here. Might get a side benefit from selling the conversion programme to other offices, but unimportant.

No problem at all. I'm just very, very tired of listening to/reading self-important individuals, whether here or in the LBM, who haven't the necessary specific knowledge required to either trade in or opine on any given mkt. There is, btw, an industry-standard term for chaps such as you, and it is not flattering.

Gee, I'm truly sorry if my accurate observation(s) bothers/bother you.

Btw, if you think my recent comments were insults, that's another subject about which you haven't a clue. Uninformed clowns (regarding energy mkts) such as you do UNTOLD damage to this nation, and you should live so long as to get a free pass on your drive-by silliness (the gentlest term I could find at short notice, and I do credit Mr. Limbaugh for his adaptation of the adjective used).

45 posted on 05/17/2006 10:02:22 PM PDT by SAJ (b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD
Good. You're a successful stock trader and investor. More power to you!

Stick to what you know. You sound more or less like Cheryl Strauss Tinhorn regarding futures mkts.

46 posted on 05/17/2006 10:03:49 PM PDT by SAJ (b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: miliantnutcase
I am in the west, most of the engineering work is done in Houston. I am not aware of any projects regarding Ashland, but a logical bet would favor an expansion, just so they can stay competitive.
47 posted on 05/17/2006 10:05:58 PM PDT by Michael.SF. ("I don't think Pat Kennedy is crazy, he's just a drunk" -- G. Gordon Liddy (5-10-06))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD
BTW, how does that old saying go? ''Never confuse a bull market with genius'', is it?

Actually, an old Byrd's song, derived from Ecclesiastes if I'm not mistaken, defines markets best:

'To everything, there is a season.'

Now, try solving -- even approximately -- the problem of profiting in mkts in ANY season. Some can, some can't. Some have, some haven't.

Just a query -- what was the last time you profited from a short sale, in ANY mkt? Why is it that I somehow feel constrained to suppose that your answer would be 'Never', assuming an honest response.

As noted previously: good luck to you. You'll be needing it, regarding trading.

48 posted on 05/17/2006 10:27:58 PM PDT by SAJ (b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

I'm not up on the current situation with Ashland, but didn't they just sell off the rest of their interest last year in the M/A refinery in LA to Marathon. Doesn't sound too expansionist a philosophy.


49 posted on 05/17/2006 10:32:44 PM PDT by SAJ (b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SAJ
Norway is a good country and the people are super friendly.

In the oil arena, Norway sits on approximately half of the remaining reserves of oil and gas in Europe. It supplies 10 % of Europe's gas consumption and within a few years will increase gas exports dramatically and produce 30 % of European gas imports. It is obvious by such production numbers that Norway must have sent all of its environmentalists out on some fjord to catch a Mother Ship to marital bliss. We must get some sort of Heaven's Gate cult going again that gets our environmentalist putting on those Nike shoes and sipping the Kool Aid.

Might be a good task for the Noorymiester.

Good posts.

50 posted on 05/17/2006 11:21:59 PM PDT by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46
Heh heh heh!

I never said one word against Norway. After all, as the old rhyme goes (which my brother-in-law never tires of reciting...g!) 'Von tousand Svedes ran troo de veeds, chased by von Norvegian!'

Btw, it's not quite as rosy as you state for Norwegian energy production. There will be huge infrastructure replacement costs shortly. Also, the envirowhackos are every bit as active in Norway as anywhere else, perhaps more so in some cases. An old fraternity brother of mine (Norwegian, moved back there) tried last year to recruit me and a few others of our acquaintance to protest after the 19 October accident. Nutjob project, that, and I would have laughed at him except that he was always a VERY nice gent. I merely declined.

You can bet your soul, however, that my old friend is the BEST face of this lot. I'd sooner give al-Qaida a pass than the envirototalitarians.

51 posted on 05/17/2006 11:48:05 PM PDT by SAJ (b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SAJ

A good word for them: envirototalitarians.


52 posted on 05/18/2006 12:01:27 AM PDT by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: SAJ
Doesn't sound too expansionist a philosophy.

It does for Marathon.

The oil industry is both consolidating (mergers, aquisitions) and modernizing their refining capabilities. Modernizing often includes an increase in their refining capabilities. These are not contradictory, although they may seem that way to some.

53 posted on 05/18/2006 5:43:37 AM PDT by Michael.SF. ("I don't think Pat Kennedy is crazy, he's just a drunk" -- G. Gordon Liddy (5-10-06))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

First of all you’re preaching to the choir. I didn’t assert that profit equals gouging. I only asserted that some of the increased cost can attributed to profit OR gouging. I don’t have any quarrel with profit, within reason in the case of a de facto monopoly.
I also have no quarrel with capital investment and depreciation of the investment as a component of the cost of a gallon of gasoline, but the cost for a depreciated investment is spread over perhaps 20 years. So depreciation of capital investment would not result in a short term spike as we’ve seen, and I would think the refiners would be sharing news about investment in refining capacity to ward off charges of gouging or excessive profit.. If the investment is required do to new regulations, such as for the blending of ethanol, then that too would be a depreciated capital investment, so again, if they share the cost data perhaps we can then blame the regulators, instead of the refiners that should have a profit motive. BUT, my original point was, the dramatic increase in cost cannot be solely attributed to the world cost of crude. In fact, the per barrel cost is down substantially today from the recent spike, but the retail price is still at the peak.
And, if you know the actual cost breakdown attributable to depreciated investment that has contributed to the extraordinary price increase, by all means, share with us.


54 posted on 05/18/2006 11:16:19 AM PDT by RLM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46
Thanks. Happy to claim credit for inventing it...but I didn't. As far as I know, that term goes back to an old mate of mine around 1982 or 1983. (He probably got it from somewhere, too, but ya never know).

FReegards!

55 posted on 05/23/2006 10:16:32 PM PDT by SAJ (b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson