Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gabz
"I can't agree with that as long as the majority of states MANDATE insurance coverage. It would work if insurance was optional, but as long as I have to pay for it........"

Liability Insurance is mandated to prevent scumbags from riding around, hitting someone and leaving a responsible person to pay the bills. Personal Injury Protection is the insurance I am talking about (or the other person's liability insurance shouldn't have to pay for non-seatbelt wearing injuries).
49 posted on 05/15/2006 6:04:19 AM PDT by Londo Molari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Londo Molari
(or the other person's liability insurance shouldn't have to pay for non-seatbelt wearing injuries).

How does one prove the only reasn for the injury was because of non-seatbelt wearing?

I wear my seatbelt, it's the way I was taught to drive back in the 70s, long before these nanny state laws came into effect. I just have a very hard time with the nanny state and that is what these mandatory seatbelt and helmet laws are.

50 posted on 05/15/2006 6:10:41 AM PDT by Gabz (Smokers are the beta version)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson