Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Londo Molari
(or the other person's liability insurance shouldn't have to pay for non-seatbelt wearing injuries).

How does one prove the only reasn for the injury was because of non-seatbelt wearing?

I wear my seatbelt, it's the way I was taught to drive back in the 70s, long before these nanny state laws came into effect. I just have a very hard time with the nanny state and that is what these mandatory seatbelt and helmet laws are.

50 posted on 05/15/2006 6:10:41 AM PDT by Gabz (Smokers are the beta version)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: Gabz

"How does one prove the only reasn for the injury was because of non-seatbelt wearing?"

Don't wear a helmet & a head injury -- the insurance company should have a right not to pay unless you asked for "non-helmet wearing coverage".

Don't wear a seatbeat and get thrown from the car or through a windshield -- the insurance company should have a right not to pay unless you asked for "non-seatbelt wearing coverage".

Why should the rest of the insurance paying public have to pay for someone else's choice not to wear a seatbelt or helmet? Goes back to that "driving is not a right" thing. If people want the freedom not to wear a seatbelt or wear a helmet the responsiblity should be accepted for their risky behavior. Period


55 posted on 05/15/2006 6:22:40 AM PDT by Londo Molari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson