To: Londo Molari
I think that anyone that wants to drive without a seatbelt should have that right. However, I also think that your insurance company should have the right to refuse to pay for your injuries if you do not have a seatbelt on (or change an extra "non-seatbelt" fee for coverage). Same goes with motorcycle helmets -- any head injury that could have been avoided by wearing a helmet shouldn't be covered if you don't have a helmet on. I can't agree with that as long as the majority of states MANDATE insurance coverage. It would work if insurance was optional, but as long as I have to pay for it........
45 posted on
05/15/2006 5:51:52 AM PDT by
Gabz
(Smokers are the beta version)
To: Gabz
"I can't agree with that as long as the majority of states MANDATE insurance coverage. It would work if insurance was optional, but as long as I have to pay for it........"
Liability Insurance is mandated to prevent scumbags from riding around, hitting someone and leaving a responsible person to pay the bills. Personal Injury Protection is the insurance I am talking about (or the other person's liability insurance shouldn't have to pay for non-seatbelt wearing injuries).
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson