Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/14/2006 7:09:59 AM PDT by NorthEasterner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NorthEasterner

Not if Her Heinous has anything to say about it...Warner had better watch his back!


2 posted on 05/14/2006 7:21:22 AM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorthEasterner

Mark Warner is such a smooth, slippery snake, he'd wrap his coils around Allen and choke the life out of him.


3 posted on 05/14/2006 7:21:44 AM PDT by Fairview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorthEasterner
Anyone running for 2008, in either party, is a long shot - even Hillary - at this point.

On the Republican side, I would say Allen has as good a chance as anyone and better than most. On the Democrat side, this is the first time I have heard Warner mentioned.

5 posted on 05/14/2006 7:23:25 AM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorthEasterner
As a Virginian I can say the following things about the Warner administration:

1. He raised taxes after running on a platform not to do so.

2. He main accomplishment was to do very little other then raise taxes. He is very much a stealth democrat, he has very little in a record of accomplishment BUT also very little in a record of actually doing harm. (Maybe that now defines a successful democrat!)

3. His most attractive feature as a candidate is he is attractive. He looks good in public and on TV.

He got into office as did his protegee Kaine because a serious of lackluster GOP candidates and campaigns. (Again Warner didn't do ANYTHING so there was little to campaign against regarding Kaine!)
9 posted on 05/14/2006 7:50:14 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorthEasterner

From poster EternalVigilance:

A man named Ed Gillespie, whose lobbying firm consists of him and Jack Quinn, Bill Clinton's lawyer, has taken very large amounts of money from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to promote Open Borders.

Ed has shuttled between his cashcow K Street firm and the RNC and this White House for the last six years.

And here's the kicker: Ed Gillespie is now the head of George Allen's PAC.

I think folks should know.

George Allen is an empty suit. His national security credentials are nonexistent. The only true conservative who looks like he might be running is Newt and, if you saw meet the depressed this morning, he makes a lot of sense.

But given his total lack of national security credentials and charisma deficit, I'd have to seriously consider McCain over Allen.

Allen as the nominee pretty much assures a Dem in the White House.

Recently Allen had the audacity to suggest that the US should relax visa requirements for countries that had failed to meet minimum requirements for such relaxed standards.

Allen doesn't get it. He has no national security credentials, has expressed no significant national security thoughts, has introduced no significant national security legislation, and has held no senate leadership positions on national security-related committees.

He is not what we need in this age.

His views on social issues are solid and his fiscal views are good as well. But he falls woefully short on the only issue that really matters while we are in a World War.


10 posted on 05/14/2006 9:38:55 AM PDT by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorthEasterner

Despite what media/pundits and half the political junkies in this country would have you believe, I think Warner is the probable Democratic nominee. I think if Brad Henry is re-elected, he may run too. Because the thing about the Democrats is, in the post-Kennedy era, they have only had success when running Southerners who were percieved as moderate at the time. Every idiot knows this. Therefore, Hillary fails the first test of what's necessary to actually be elected, and never mind the fact she can raise alot of money, Cuomo was able to raise alot of money in 1991 and what happened, and Carter couldn't raise a dime before Iowa as far as 1976 goes. The Democrats are idiots, and they have a consistent record of shooting themselves in the foot, but I doubt it's consistent enough to where they're throwing 2008 away.

Another simple political truth of the post-JFK era, when you run a Southern Democrat at the top of a ticket and have him oppose two Yankees, the Southern Democrat will at least break even in the Southeast. It is for this reason that I think that as a part, we should forget even entertaining the idea of having a non-Southerner as nominee.


15 posted on 05/14/2006 9:58:29 AM PDT by AzaleaCity5691 (The enemy lies in the heart of Gadsden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Corin Stormhands

fyi


20 posted on 05/14/2006 10:37:16 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorthEasterner

That would be a very interesting race indeed. Being from VA, they were both great governors. I love George Allen, he would get my vote!


41 posted on 05/14/2006 7:22:42 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorthEasterner
Here come the Virginians

This guy?

-PJ

56 posted on 05/15/2006 12:51:56 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson