Propaganda? From AOL?
Impossible!
1 posted on
05/11/2006 12:58:26 PM PDT by
Sam Hill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: Sam Hill
EVERYBODY hates Bush except for me and three other posters here on FR.
2 posted on
05/11/2006 12:59:42 PM PDT by
AmusedBystander
(Republicans - doing the work that Democrats won't do since 1854.)
To: Howlin; Deb; kcvl; Mo1; Enchante; nopardons; veronica; KJC1; stocksthatgoup; mewzilla; backhoe; ...
A "more agit-prop from our one party media" ping.
3 posted on
05/11/2006 1:01:06 PM PDT by
Sam Hill
To: Sam Hill
It's just your imagination.............now get back to your Oprah, Maury, and CNN and we'll take care of everything..........
5 posted on
05/11/2006 1:02:54 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(In warfare there are no constant conditions. --- The Art of War by SunTzu)
To: Sam Hill
I think that is why AOL is losing money. They care more about ideology than profits. Is Ted, the mouth of the south, Turner back?
6 posted on
05/11/2006 1:03:00 PM PDT by
bronxboy
To: Sam Hill
AOL like most Drive by Media is biased. And like the NYTimes and others, they are losing subscribers. They have not connected the dots, and perhaps they won't before they go belly up. Who cares. I find my news on Free Republic and other sources online. I just use AOL as my ISP, and if I did not have so many friends in chat rooms, I would use a different ISP.
To: Sam Hill
AOL isn't independent - they are part of Time Warner - I.e. CNN, Time etc...
9 posted on
05/11/2006 1:03:17 PM PDT by
gondramB
(He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
To: Sam Hill
To: Sam Hill
Probably because his approval ratings are so much higher than AOHell's.
13 posted on
05/11/2006 1:05:54 PM PDT by
Spyder
To: Sam Hill
I don't know if AOL hates Bush but I know that I hate AOL regardless.
14 posted on
05/11/2006 1:07:30 PM PDT by
Blzbba
(Beauty is just a light switch away...)
To: Sam Hill
AOL, all of Time-Warner, Hollyweird, CNN, PMSNBC, ABC, See B.S. News, NY Slimes, L.A. Slimes, et al.
15 posted on
05/11/2006 1:07:36 PM PDT by
Recovering_Democrat
((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
To: Sam Hill
I've noticed they ALWAYS post the geekiest photo of Bush they can find. They are odious.
18 posted on
05/11/2006 1:11:14 PM PDT by
veronica
("A person needs a sense of mission like the air he breathes...")
To: Sam Hill
To: Sam Hill
It is not only AOL it seems everybody does. Even conservatives on Freerepublic. Some of it is warranted but most of it is not. There is a sense, in my opinion, that he will make a monumental comeback. Just a hunch. When he does all these now cliche posts that say "Jorge Bush" and "President Jorge" will be a thing of the past. Just like in sports there are band wagon jumpers in politics and this forum contains a plethora of them
Nothing against those kind of posts but it is getting as old as "I guess he won't be reelected in 2008"
To: Sam Hill
To: Sam Hill
Anybody dumb enough to still be using AOL deserves what they get.
26 posted on
05/11/2006 1:21:25 PM PDT by
metesky
("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
To: Sam Hill
Ever since Time-Warner took over AOL, it's editorial position became flagrantly liberal. The post 9-11 coverage was pathetic...the very day it happened they were inveighing against profiling...and how Islam was a religion of peace.
28 posted on
05/11/2006 1:21:49 PM PDT by
Paul Ross
(We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
To: Sam Hill
Gee, I learned today from reading an article about Patches Kennedy that he used to date a woman who was a senior exec at AOL.
And, that she used to be at the CIA.
Things that make you go hmmmmmmmm.
29 posted on
05/11/2006 1:22:11 PM PDT by
TC Rider
(The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
To: Sam Hill
LOL, I saw this too and thought the exact same thing. But like you demonstrated, it is nothing new.
30 posted on
05/11/2006 1:23:42 PM PDT by
KJC1
(Definition of insanity: Facilitating lib victories in order to "preserve conservatism.")
To: Sam Hill
AOL just announced they are laying off at least 1000 people, maybe more, so they must be doing a booming business. Hope they crash and burn.........
46 posted on
05/11/2006 1:50:59 PM PDT by
Enchante
(General Hayden: I've Never Taken a Domestic Flight That Landed in Waziristan!)
To: Sam Hill; All
IT IS CLEARY EVIDENT THAT AOL HAS A AGENDA.
IF ANY ASTUTE FREEPER KNOWS HOW I CAN KEEP MY MAILING ADDRESS AND DUMP AOL,PLEASE LET ME KNOW.
47 posted on
05/11/2006 1:51:16 PM PDT by
alpha-8-25-02
("SAVED BY GRACE AND GRACE ALONE")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson