Replies

To: NC28203

I'd hazzard a guess that the answer has something to do with leap year...?

20 posted on 05/09/2006 12:32:42 PM PDT by camle (Keep your mind open and somebody will fill if full of something for you.)

To: camle

I'd hazzard a guess that the answer has something to do with leap year...?

That's what I was thinking. Whoever was elected in 1896 would not have had a leap year as there would be no leap year in 1900.

84 posted on 05/09/2006 1:31:58 PM PDT by VRWCmember

To: camle

I'd hazzard a guess that the answer has something to do with leap year...?

THat's a good guess. 1800 and 1900 were not leap years.

108 posted on 05/09/2006 2:23:46 PM PDT by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794