![](http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/1091/trestanding1rn.gif)
This author founded the Daily Kos. Very interesting.
1 posted on
05/07/2006 5:38:15 PM PDT by
rdb3
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: rdb3
I thought they all longed for the Clinton years! Seems there even a great number of freepers who would rather see Hillary in the White House. I detest that woman, and fear for this nation because my own party is going to help her perhaps get elected!!!! (rather members of my party)
2 posted on
05/07/2006 5:40:23 PM PDT by
ladyinred
To: rdb3
3 posted on
05/07/2006 5:40:52 PM PDT by
308MBR
(The GOP should remember the fate of the Whigs as they run away from their base.)
To: rdb3
the jobless recoveryWhat the hell does that mean? Can't he make a case without lying? Nevermind.
5 posted on
05/07/2006 5:44:53 PM PDT by
KJacob
(If I yawn it is only in anticipation.)
To: rdb3
the jobless recovery
They are STILL trotting out that line? Damn the Dems must be more desperate than we thought.....
6 posted on
05/07/2006 5:47:11 PM PDT by
MikefromOhio
(aka MikeinIraq)
To: rdb3
Too much a Clinton Democrat / Too little a female.
7 posted on
05/07/2006 5:49:44 PM PDT by
llevrok
(sui generis)
To: rdb3
Ahh-so! Wondered where I'd heard that name before.
Bleah.
8 posted on
05/07/2006 5:49:57 PM PDT by
Theresawithanh
(Veni, vidi, velcro - I came, I saw, I stuck around...)
To: rdb3
KOS should be SOS, or "Stuck on Stupid".
10 posted on
05/07/2006 5:50:12 PM PDT by
stm
(Our country and world are at a crossroads; taking the wrong path is not an option.)
To: rdb3
Well, we know that the founder of the Daily Kos is a jerk.
The interesting thing is that the Washington ComPost decided to publish this cr*p.
11 posted on
05/07/2006 5:50:28 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: rdb3
unimaginable corruption and an imperial presidency with little regard for the Constitution or the rule of lawWhat the heck is this guy talking about?
13 posted on
05/07/2006 5:53:51 PM PDT by
rawhide
To: rdb3
Moving into 2008, Republicans will be fighting to shake off the legacy of the Bush years:. . . These Repubs had better had better not follow the Demrat's rewrite of history here. . .
They can defend their president and remind America how much we can be grateful for when it comes to the Bush Legacy. . .and the horrors imposed on America as a result of the Demrat Legacy of Bill and Hillary, Inc. . . .
17 posted on
05/07/2006 5:59:04 PM PDT by
cricket
(Live Liberal-free. . .)
To: rdb3
Moving into 2008, Republicans will be fighting to shake off the legacy of the Bush years: the jobless recovery, the foreign misadventures, the nightmarish fiscal mismanagement, the Katrina mess, unimaginable corruption and an imperial presidency with little regard for the Constitution or the rule of lawAw, come on. Tell us what you really think! ;-)
20 posted on
05/07/2006 6:03:14 PM PDT by
HitmanLV
("5 Minute Penalty for #40, Ann Theresa Calvello!" - RIP 1929-2006)
To: rdb3
And if she is the nominee, will Kos, et al sit on their hands and not vote?
Much like the Republicans if McCain somehow gets the nomination.
Either party will for the most part support their candidate. Even if they are the lesser of 2 evils.
22 posted on
05/07/2006 6:04:44 PM PDT by
joonbug
To: rdb3
That second paragraph is a real pisser, ain't it? Does this guy write the talking points for the Dims?
25 posted on
05/07/2006 6:10:00 PM PDT by
Past Your Eyes
(Every time you think, you weaken the nation.)
To: rdb3
Say it ain't so Markos! She's the quintessential Democrat.
Run Hillary Run!
(Thanks for posting rdb3. Interesting.)
26 posted on
05/07/2006 6:12:11 PM PDT by
PGalt
To: rdb3
Here's Hillary's problem:![](http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c2/Davis1950/coocoohillary-vi.gif)
29 posted on
05/07/2006 6:28:56 PM PDT by
Cobra64
(All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
To: rdb3
Moving into 2008, Republicans will be fighting to shake off the legacy of the Bush years: the jobless recovery, the foreign misadventures, the nightmarish fiscal mismanagement, the Katrina mess, unimaginable corruption and an imperial presidency with little regard for the Constitution or the rule of law.Nope, no bias there.
30 posted on
05/07/2006 6:33:40 PM PDT by
umgud
(the profound is only so to those that it is)
To: rdb3
[Had Kerry not lent himself millions to reach the Iowa caucuses, and had Dean not been so green a candidate, Dean probably would have been the nominee.]
Yeah, and he would have lost by at least 20 million votes. LOL!
[Our crashing of Washington's gates wasn't about ideology...]
No, but it WAS about ideology. Dang, these fools are such liars!
[Democrats haven't won more than 50 percent of the vote in a presidential election since 1976. Heck, we haven't won more than 50.1 percent since 1964. ]
And there is a good reason for that, laddy.
He's an extremist Lefty with an extreme case of hemorrhoids as a result of the Incompetent and Indecipherable Goron's humiliating loss in 2000 and The sinking Lying Fraud's (Kerry's) humiliating loss in 2004. This is simply more proof that the seething, raging, hating uncontrolled Id's of the far Left are fully dominating the unfortunate Democrat party. The only thing the Democrats have going for them right now is the sellout and corrupted Republicans.
32 posted on
05/07/2006 6:58:36 PM PDT by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Every vote for a Democrat is a vote for $10/gallon gas.)
To: rdb3
"Just as we crazy political junkies glimpsed the viability of the candidacy of an obscure governor from a small New England state three years ago"
Wow, since when did WaPo figure out that what's most lacking in its pages is the "psychotic left"?????? Got news for you, Mr. Kos-kiddie, your loony tune guy from VT was NOT 'viable' - he lost big, and if he'd somehow gotten the nomination he would have been trounced in the most historic landslide this country has ever seen.
Of course, the lying MSM would have tried to run interference for him in the general election, but Howie Dean was never a 'viable' candidate in a national election..... and the loony left of the 'Rat party will only drag them further into defeat. Kos hasn't managed to figure out that all those grim statistics since 1964 mean something other than "what this country really craves is a truly lunatic leftist as president!" I don't question that Kos is effective in his own way with (and speaks for ) his fellow lunatics of the reptilian left, but he surely should hesitate more to give 'Rat candidates advice about how to win 51% in a presidential election!!
34 posted on
05/07/2006 7:02:28 PM PDT by
Enchante
(General Hayden: I've Never Taken a Domestic Flight That Landed in Waziristan!)
To: rdb3
In person, Clinton is one of the warmest politicians I've ever met, but her advisers have stripped what personality she has, hiding it from the public. We would all love to see the "real" Hellary exposed to the public. She wouldn't last 5 minutes.
36 posted on
05/07/2006 7:16:22 PM PDT by
mcenedo
(lying liberal media - our most dangerous and powerful enemy)
To: rdb3
42 posted on
05/08/2006 1:26:56 AM PDT by
SR 50
(Larry)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson