To: Graybeard58
They present a danger to any drunk Kennedy on a sailboat though.
To: Graybeard58
3 posted on
05/06/2006 7:30:26 AM PDT by
DTogo
(I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
To: Graybeard58
Maybe by the time this project is finished, Kennedy and Cronkite will have moved to warmer climes where they have different views.
5 posted on
05/06/2006 7:34:43 AM PDT by
altura
(Bushbot No. 1 - get in line.)
To: Graybeard58
it will be discovered in subsequent years, similar to the herds of caribou on the alaskan pipeline, gams of hyannis orcinuses (please correct my plural) have multiplied by the cape cod windmills and been seen frolicking in the bay on oldsmobile brand jet skis.
To: Graybeard58
What could Kennedy have possibly given Stevens considering that Kennedy has probably stabbed Stevens in the back time and time again concerning energy in Alaska?
7 posted on
05/06/2006 7:41:14 AM PDT by
VeniVidiVici
(ICE, ICE Baby.)
To: Graybeard58
A provision tucked into a bill authorizing activities for the U.S. Coast Guard would give Massachusetts' governor a veto over the project, although the turbines would be located in federal waters. What kind of BS is this?
Maybe so they can shift the blame to the RINO govenor instead of on the rich demonrats on Martha's Vineyard.
8 posted on
05/06/2006 7:42:35 AM PDT by
CPOSharky
(Go home and fix your own country before you complain about ours.)
To: Graybeard58
Well, one could probably make at least 10 gallons of biodiesel out of Ted Kennedy.
9 posted on
05/06/2006 7:53:16 AM PDT by
GSlob
To: Graybeard58
Teddy's very presence on the Cape will probably increase the output of this windmill unless he is standing up wind.
12 posted on
05/06/2006 8:28:22 AM PDT by
The Great RJ
("Mir wölle bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
To: Graybeard58
I think the windmills are quite attractive and their pilings will make good fish attractors
13 posted on
05/06/2006 9:15:56 AM PDT by
fso301
To: Graybeard58
I'm sure they have to do SOMETHING
to rid the area of the horrible stink from the Kennedy compound.
14 posted on
05/06/2006 9:29:31 AM PDT by
Quix
( PREPARE . . . PRAY . . . PLACE your trust, hope, faith and life in God's hands moment by moment)
To: Graybeard58
Pooooooooooooooor little fat drunk Ted.
15 posted on
05/06/2006 9:35:46 AM PDT by
stephenjohnbanker
(Immigration: Acting like dupes does not earn us their respect, but their CONTEMPT.))
To: Graybeard58
Stevens consulted with Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., whose family retreat is eight miles from the proposed wind farm. Kennedy and other members of the Massachusetts congressional delegation oppose the project, but he has denied that personal considerations are involved.
Kennedy spokeswoman Melissa Wagoner said Kennedy views the project as "a sweetheart deal for a developer" and continues to oppose it.
And with reasoning like that it's clear that his opposition is entirely a personal consideration.
It's going to be a "sweetheart deal" for whatever developer installs them. Regardless of whatever one-time installation fee there is, there's still the obvious neglect of the far reaching benefits of having these extra generators for now and forever more. I have yet to read a logical or reasonable objection to the project.
Then again this is a Democrat we're talking about.
16 posted on
05/06/2006 10:57:12 AM PDT by
Thoro
(Then an accidental overdose of gamma radiation alters his body chemistry....)
To: Graybeard58
The Kennedy Legacy on Environmentalism: yachts, private airplanes, SUV's, mansions and no windmills.
Role models every one of them!
To: Graybeard58
Well, I can understand why Ted Kennedy is so opposed -- for him, the visual intrustion is twice as severe as it is for the rest of us.
18 posted on
05/09/2006 2:28:17 PM PDT by
steve-b
(A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson