Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Administration favors Cape Cod wind project (drunk fat ted is saddened)
Waterbury Republican-American ^ | May 6, 2006 | Josef Hebert (A.P.)

Posted on 05/06/2006 7:14:40 AM PDT by Graybeard58

WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration and two influential senators weighed in Friday against a provision that would block a 130-turbine wind farm off Cape Cod, where some of Washington's most powerful have vacation retreats.

The wind farm, which would be located in Nantucket Sound about six miles off shore, has been a focus of controversy for five years. Developers won favorable environmental reviews and hoped to have it completed in 2009.

A provision tucked into a bill authorizing activities for the U.S. Coast Guard would give Massachusetts' governor a veto over the project, although the turbines would be located in federal waters. Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney opposes the project.

Energy Undersecretary David Garman on Friday called the provision "unwise" at a time when President Bush and many members of Congress are trying to spur the development of wind turbines as an alternative for generating electricity.

The Republican chairman and the top Democrat of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee vowed to block the Coast Guard bill unless the provision is removed.

Sens. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., and Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., said interfering in the project in this way and at this late date would have a chilling effect on investments in renewable energy and conflicts with the need to develop alternative energy sources.

"It sets a terrible precedent" to allow governors to veto such projects, Domenici said.

Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, added the provision during negotiations with the House on a final version of the Coast Guard bill.

Stevens consulted with Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., whose family retreat is eight miles from the proposed wind farm. Kennedy and other members of the Massachusetts congressional delegation oppose the project, but he has denied that personal considerations are involved.

Kennedy spokeswoman Melissa Wagoner said Kennedy views the project as "a sweetheart deal for a developer" and continues to oppose it.

She said "he wasn't involved in crafting the language" in the Coast Guard bill but that he and Stevens discussed it. She said Kennedy long has maintained the governor should have a say on the project.

Aaron Saunders, a spokesman for Stevens, said the Alaska senator viewed it as a matter of state's rights. "He and Senator Kennedy spoke about the issue. Senator Kennedy expressed his opinions on them and Senator Stevens agreed."

"If this were a project off the coast of Alaska, he (Stevens) believes the citizens of Alaska should have a say on where that project should be located," Saunders said.

Cape Wind spokesman Mark Rodgers said the company has spent $23 million so far, mostly on environmental reviews and permitting.

The turbines would stand 426 feet in shallow waters off an area of Nantucket Sound known as Horseshoe Shoal. Opponents argue that the turbines would be an eyesore and could threaten water navigation.

"A lot of people think the turbines are beautiful and elegant," Rodgers said. He said they would be six miles from the closest shore "and at that distance they would be (viewed as) a half an inch above the horizon."

Cape Wind estimates that the wind turbines would be able to supply three-fourths of the electricity used on Cape Cod and on the nearby islands of Nantucket and Martha's Vineyard.

The Northeast region "has a demonstrated need for new sources of electricity to assure reliability of service and affordable electricity for the region's consumers, and this project will generate clean energy to help meet that need," Garman wrote in expressing the administration's support for the wind farm.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: capecod; capewind; energy; windenergy; windfarm

1 posted on 05/06/2006 7:14:43 AM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

They present a danger to any drunk Kennedy on a sailboat though.


2 posted on 05/06/2006 7:18:22 AM PDT by NewCenturions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
YEH!! Go Cape Wind!!

Utility scale offshore wind has been going on successfully in Europe since 2002.


3 posted on 05/06/2006 7:30:26 AM PDT by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
The Offshore Horns Reef Project
4 posted on 05/06/2006 7:32:42 AM PDT by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Maybe by the time this project is finished, Kennedy and Cronkite will have moved to warmer climes where they have different views.


5 posted on 05/06/2006 7:34:43 AM PDT by altura (Bushbot No. 1 - get in line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
it will be discovered in subsequent years, similar to the herds of caribou on the alaskan pipeline, gams of hyannis orcinuses (please correct my plural) have multiplied by the cape cod windmills and been seen frolicking in the bay on oldsmobile brand jet skis.
6 posted on 05/06/2006 7:40:27 AM PDT by JohnLongIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

What could Kennedy have possibly given Stevens considering that Kennedy has probably stabbed Stevens in the back time and time again concerning energy in Alaska?


7 posted on 05/06/2006 7:41:14 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (ICE, ICE Baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
A provision tucked into a bill authorizing activities for the U.S. Coast Guard would give Massachusetts' governor a veto over the project, although the turbines would be located in federal waters.

What kind of BS is this?

Maybe so they can shift the blame to the RINO govenor instead of on the rich demonrats on Martha's Vineyard.

8 posted on 05/06/2006 7:42:35 AM PDT by CPOSharky (Go home and fix your own country before you complain about ours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Well, one could probably make at least 10 gallons of biodiesel out of Ted Kennedy.


9 posted on 05/06/2006 7:53:16 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
Well, one could probably make at least 10 gallons of biodiesel out of Ted Kennedy.

And at least another couple gallons of ethanol that hasn't been processed by his liver yet.

10 posted on 05/06/2006 8:17:28 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Never ask a Kennedy if he'll have another drink. It's nobody's business how much he's had already.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

He does not process spirits, he lives by, and in, them. An intensely spiritual man, spiritual to the flammability point.


11 posted on 05/06/2006 8:20:33 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Teddy's very presence on the Cape will probably increase the output of this windmill unless he is standing up wind.


12 posted on 05/06/2006 8:28:22 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir wölle bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

I think the windmills are quite attractive and their pilings will make good fish attractors


13 posted on 05/06/2006 9:15:56 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

I'm sure they have to do SOMETHING

to rid the area of the horrible stink from the Kennedy compound.


14 posted on 05/06/2006 9:29:31 AM PDT by Quix ( PREPARE . . . PRAY . . . PLACE your trust, hope, faith and life in God's hands moment by moment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Pooooooooooooooor little fat drunk Ted.


15 posted on 05/06/2006 9:35:46 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Immigration: Acting like dupes does not earn us their respect, but their CONTEMPT.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Stevens consulted with Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., whose family retreat is eight miles from the proposed wind farm. Kennedy and other members of the Massachusetts congressional delegation oppose the project, but he has denied that personal considerations are involved.

Kennedy spokeswoman Melissa Wagoner said Kennedy views the project as "a sweetheart deal for a developer" and continues to oppose it.


And with reasoning like that it's clear that his opposition is entirely a personal consideration.

It's going to be a "sweetheart deal" for whatever developer installs them. Regardless of whatever one-time installation fee there is, there's still the obvious neglect of the far reaching benefits of having these extra generators for now and forever more. I have yet to read a logical or reasonable objection to the project.

Then again this is a Democrat we're talking about.
16 posted on 05/06/2006 10:57:12 AM PDT by Thoro (Then an accidental overdose of gamma radiation alters his body chemistry....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

The Kennedy Legacy on Environmentalism: yachts, private airplanes, SUV's, mansions and no windmills.

Role models every one of them!


17 posted on 05/06/2006 11:17:20 AM PDT by BlessedByLiberty (Respectfully submitted,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Well, I can understand why Ted Kennedy is so opposed -- for him, the visual intrustion is twice as severe as it is for the rest of us.


18 posted on 05/09/2006 2:28:17 PM PDT by steve-b (A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thoro
"a sweetheart deal for a developer"

Not at all like the "Big Dig," a sweetheart deal for all at a cost of $15,000,000,000.
19 posted on 05/09/2006 2:40:55 PM PDT by Beckwith (The liberal media has picked sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson