Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: txrangerette
>>Don't know yet, but several among us are ready to believe it is because of the "hookers on the hill" scandal. They are posting it now. Sickening to do that, imo, with no evidence of such.<<


The blogs pushing the story don't even name Goss - they say "a former intelligence committee member now working with the agency" and they cite no evidence.

So I don't see how anybody who wants to decide based on actual evidence could conclude that Goss is guilty of anything.

Again, I'm betting on a difference over the approach to Iran - that Goss did not want to go to war - but that is just my speculation - no evidence there either.
584 posted on 05/05/2006 11:29:02 AM PDT by gondramB (He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies ]


To: gondramB

Who has concluded that Goss is guilty of anything?


633 posted on 05/05/2006 11:35:52 AM PDT by lugsoul ("Crash" - the movie that teaches we are all incurable racists, except when we are not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 584 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB

Porter walked into the Oval Office, sat down, said Iran is a slam dunk!

Dick Cheney operates the action of a pump shotgun.

The President drops his pen. Looks up and asks for Porter's resignation.

(Side note: President finds VETO PEN on the floor when he went looking for the one he dropped)


841 posted on 05/05/2006 12:39:38 PM PDT by NAVY84 (The path of least resistance for Democrats is TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 584 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson