Oh phooey, you do more than just "question" science that conflicts with young-earth creationism. :P
Perhaps. But I do not seek the force of law to keep that kind of science out of public schools. I accept it as just another point of view from certain observers who reject the authority and accuracy of the biblical texts; who assume the processes we observe today have always taken place at the same rate and in the same way; who assume that because something may be intelligently designed it must be "supernatural" or "religious" in nature; who are scientifically incapable of repeating the 4.5 billion year history they claim as scientific fact; who cannot articulate the potential conflation between common ancestry and a common Creator; who allow multifarious extrapolations and inferences for themselves and call it science, while denying the same of those would extrapolate intelligent design from the ubiquitous presence of organized matter performing specific functions; who assume science can take place without assumptions and thus remain blind to their own.