Replies

I guess we'll have to just differ on our definitions of what panspermia is or will be labeled as, defined as.

Some of the earlier discussions of the ET's part in such things included the label panspermia. I don't recall if panspermia was used by the sources themselves or by the persons writing about what the sources had revealed.

I suppose you could call the ET explanation a variant of Intelligent Design--certainly. But, that wouldn't fit the political agenda of so many evolutionists so rabidly hostile to Christianity etc.

I have plenty of (for me and many I know) evidence regarding such. But none I want to bother sharing here. But you could track it down at Dr Stephen Greer's DISCLOSURE PROJECT and a plethora of other sites. But it would be a bit of a tedious task. It's not set out per se as about that topic. The evidence is mixed in amidst a bunch of other stuff of varying quality and import, depending on the sources and sites etc.

So, help yourself, throw it all in the trash. But when it comes up again in public, you'll remember where you first ran into such notions.

You know Quix I have been following what you are saying here and as you say it would be a tedious task over many many sources.

But you can already see where they are going with it.

And if you do post the material, do it for everyone and don't look for any confirmation from the evo-cultists.

Wolf

I guess we'll have to just differ on our definitions of what panspermia is or will be labeled as, defined as.

Actually, panspermia is well-defined. Your definition of the term is not the standard accepted definition.

I suppose you could call the ET explanation a variant of Intelligent Design--certainly.

It is a variant of intelligent design. Proponents of intelligent design have conceded that the "designer" could in fact be an extraterrestrial agent.

But, that wouldn't fit the political agenda of so many evolutionists so rabidly hostile to Christianity etc.

Please explain.

I have plenty of (for me and many I know) evidence regarding such. But none I want to bother sharing here.

Then, again, why should what you say be believed?

But you could track it down at Dr Stephen Greer's DISCLOSURE PROJECT and a plethora of other sites. But it would be a bit of a tedious task. It's not set out per se as about that topic. The evidence is mixed in amidst a bunch of other stuff of varying quality and import, depending on the sources and sites etc.

I was not aware that the Disclosure Project included in its agenda an attempt to replace the theory of evolution with a theory stating that extraterrestrials were involved with the development of life on earth. Do you have a reference? Moreover, I was also not aware that the Disclosure Project had been making any significant headway amongst biologists.