[The Ghost of FReepers Past]

Discussing the created world without crediting the Creator is plagiarism. You've assumed there is no author -- somthing you cannot know.

To demand no consideration of God when studying His creation is to insist that everything be taken out of context. If He is the author of all that exists, it is absurd to leave Him out of the discussion.

[ToryHeartland]

To demand no consideration of God when studying His creation is to insist that everything be taken out of context. If He is the author of all that exists, it is absurd to leave Him out of the discussion.

But how, in a science class, could you possibly include all the thousands of different beliefs held about God? Why not keep all that in philosophy and theology classes--surely it's already covered?

I would be fascinated to see someone show what a lesson plan and course outline would look like for an 'ID' based biology class--it is impossible to imagine.

[wireman]

You've assumed there is no author -- somthing you cannot know.

You've assumed there IS an author -- something you cannot know either.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"You've assumed there is no author -- somthing you cannot know."

Science isn't capable of providing an answer. Unfortunately, the author, if there was one, failed to leave his fingerprints on the manuscript. God is simply not capable of scientific examination.