Good read but wordy and not likely to get as much attention from practicing scientists as it should.
In addition there's not nearly as much money in recognizing evolution as in opposing it. Makes it hard to fund a strong defense.
Anyone know who, if anyone, is doing what to fix the Kansas science definition?
How is money made in opposing evolution?
I am deeply impressed by a "scientific" concept that demands protection by government, lest any school teacher give voice to any doubts or misgivings as to its veracity, or raise questions regarding its claims; and this in the land of Freedom of Speech.
The Theory (or is it now a Law?) of Evolution, in its application to questions of the origin of the phenomenon we call "life," and the existence of living entities in all their well-nigh incomprehensible diversity of form and function, is the only conceptual framework devised by the supposedly infallible human intellect that has been granted the status of exemption from the possibility of falsification.