Posted on 04/23/2006 5:47:00 AM PDT by Crackingham
Lucy’s Love Shop employee Wanda Gillespie said she was flabbergasted that South Carolina’s Legislature is considering outlawing sex toys. But banning the sale of sex toys is actually quite common in some Southern states.
The South Carolina bill, proposed by Republican Rep. Ralph Davenport, would make it a felony to sell devices used primarily for sexual stimulation and allow law enforcement to seize sex toys from raided businesses.
"That would be the most terrible thing in the world," said Ms. Gillespie, an employee the Anderson shop. "That is just flabbergasting to me. We are supposed to be in a free country, and we’re supposed to be adults who can decide what want to do and don’t want to do in the privacy of our own homes."
Ms. Gillespie, 49, said she has worked in the store for nearly 20 years and has seen people from every walk of life, including "every Sunday churchgoers."
"I know of multiple marriages that sex toys have sold because some people need that. The people who are riding us (the adult novelty industry) so hard are probably at home buying it (sex toys and novelties) on the Internet. It’s ridiculous." The measure would add sex toys to the state’s obscenity laws, which already prohibit the dissemination and advertisement of obscene materials.
People convicted under obscenity laws face up to five years in prison and a $10,000 fine.
Whaddaya want, a protective tariff for the Yankee dildo industry?
http://www.vote-smart.org/bio.php?can_id=BS021950?q=print
First Baptist Church of North Spartanburg
Nah, stick around. You'll add to the high level of discussion, Howlin.
It was only a typo, anyway. I believe expatguy meant to write "cucumbers and cumquats" and had one of those dyslexic moments like we all do occasionally.
They are thought to be two of the secret ingedients in an ancient Chinese potion that's supposed to make you . . well, you know what I mean.
And you can bet the bluenoses in South Carolina wouldn't want any of that stuff available over-the-counter where teenagers and senior citizens could get ahold of it.
There needs to be a law.
Hey, don't you live in SC?
LOL
My guess would be Amish. No electrical devices allowed.
Mark
Well for someone with their head up their a$$ (NOT YOU! The legislators!), it might just wind up being sexually stimulating!
Mark
actually you may be more correct than you realize...I can see how the 1965 Griswold case would be used to overturn this law
i am pretty certain GA does not
Texas doesn't ban sex toys per se, it just bans the "promotion" (i.e., sale or advertising) of "an obscene device", which is defined as something, and I quote, "designed or marketed as useful primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs". Most sex shops in Texas (and there are no shortage of them) avoid trouble by not describing exactly what their wares can be used for, or how, by not carrying devices that are "too realistic", and by labeling the items "novelties".
There's also a lot of room for loopholes in clause 43.23(g) of the statute: " It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this section that the person who possesses or promotes material or a device proscribed by this section does so for a bona fide medical, psychiatric, judicial, legislative, or law enforcement purpose."
Related stories (and ya gotta love the headline on the first one):
Is That a Perfectly Legal, Anatomically Correct Condom Education Model, or Are You Just Happy to See Me?Note that in the second story, what really got her in trouble was not selling the items, but instead it was describing what they were for and how they were used, thus making it clear what the "devices" were "primarily" for, which is they key phrase in the law. As BeAnn Sisemore, the Texas mom's lawyer, points out, "This law is about how you represent what the product is for. I can have the most obnoxious item in the world, and as long as I call it a 'novelty,' I can sell it all day long. If I educate you on how to use it, it's illegal."
Eight months later, after putting the Texas mom and her family through legal and financial hell, and driving them into bankruptcy, the town dropped the charges, officially stating that they didn't want to "waste city resources", but the real reasons likely involved the massive amount of national (and international) derision and scorn they were receiving, and that it came out that the "investigation" was instigated by a couple of local folks with petty personal grudges against the mom, who were trying to make trouble for her.
They're a real temptation and worthless, silly items that are pale-alternatives to the genatilia that GOD blesses men & women with to celebrate sexual relations within the Holy union of Marriage.
How many times do I have to tell everyone? It's a neck massager!
Now if that ain’t evil, turning a civilized discussion of gardening and appliances into a Civil War thread.
;-)
The governor of North Carolina is one...
Did I make a mistake in purchasing that second home in Myrtle Beach? Will this devalue my investment?
No, that would be a case where the state is imposing an unconstitutional restriction on something that is Constitutionally protected -- RKBA.
Individual rights are Constitutionally protected, and RKBA falls under that. Any law that the states pass must be Constitutional. I agree with federalist ideas in general, within the bounds of the Constitution protecting individual liberties first and foremost. I think the 10th Amendment has been ignored, in the sense that states should primarily be in charge of themselves without federal intrusion.
The idea of the feds regulating commerce was originally meant as a way to ensure a level playing field between different states, but the feds have long since used it to encroach terribly on areas of governance which should be determined by the states (e.g. drug laws).
Hahahahahahahahahaha. The only thing is the criminals will start to possess banana's and cucumber's.
Lets see first they went into the bathroom when they decided what size toilet we can have. I guess the next step would be the bedroom.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.