Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indian intervention in Nepal
4/22/06 | minus_273

Posted on 04/22/2006 11:26:16 AM PDT by minus_273

A little update for freepers tracking events in Nepal. It now appears that the state might collapse. Two things are currently happening. First, my contacts in Kathmandu valley report that the political parties and Maoist alliance are pushing for a republic and second, waves of (yes, uniformed) Maoist fighters have now entered the capital from the outlying hills and are now controlling parts of the valley outside the city's beltway. Fighting is confirmed in the following areas of the city Thapathali, Maitighar and Bhotaity.

From a strictly historical perspective, this looks very very bad. We've seen all of this before. It appears that the seven political party alliance which goes by SPA has been manipulated as predicted. In all likelihood, there will be much more combat in the city soon. If the Royal Army loses, the result will not be the democratic republic the SPA wanted but a communist one.
The King is close to China and the SPA/Maoist alliance operates out of India. .

My connections in the Indian military (yes, I have a few) say there are plans for an invasion. This would be in the event of a Maoist takeover. Indians have their own problems with Maoists and whatever their reasons for supporting the SPA/Maoist alliance, the outcome will be pretty bad for them. Nepal is close to some parts of India with Maoist violence (Andhra Pradesh, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand. Maharashtra and Bihar). A Maoist victory in Nepal will not only embolden those India but create a training an staging area in Nepal.

The Indians have changed sides. Previous governments of the nationalist BJP supported crushing the Maoists however, the socialist Congress party which now runs the country moved the other way. It was probably a gamble intended to put pressure on a hostile king and seems to have gone horribly wrong.

I expect an invasion and unfortunately, that seems the best possible outcome.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: china; communism; india; maoist; nepal; socialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: minus_273

Indians are not a race. The Mongoloid race is not alien to India.


41 posted on 04/22/2006 1:02:55 PM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: minus_273

Losar is also celebrated in Ladak, Arunachal Pradesh, Sikkim and in Himachal Pradesh in India.


42 posted on 04/22/2006 1:05:27 PM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan; CarrotAndStick
i dont make up the stuff. I just study it. Books are a better source of history than the net. Nepali royalty , tibetan and chinese ones used to intermarry. that says a lot. Nepali royalty also married indian royalty but to a much lesser extent.
by the way the temple i showed you was not a buddhist one it was pashupati nath (shiva) a hindu one. outsiders are not allowed or allowed to take photos but there is a buddha statue inside too. It is also the main temple of the country and reportedly houses part of one of shiva's avatars. Swyambu is the other major stupa and that is buddhist.



the two are usually superimposed to represent the country. like this :


so you see, you are ignorant and just making yourself look like a fool.
43 posted on 04/22/2006 1:09:09 PM PDT by minus_273
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: minus_273

BTW there are 4 million Tibetans all over India not just in Darjeeling, Siliguri and Dharmashala but also in all the major metro cities. Plus we have Buddhist of Tibetan descent in Ladak, Sikkim, HP, Uttranchal, and Arunachal Pradesh (Remember Tawang monastry?).


44 posted on 04/22/2006 1:10:17 PM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

for what is is worth nor are chinese a race. Han chinese is a very diverse group who look very different lumped into one category.

There is a perception of what chinese is and there is a perception of what an indian is and the two are not the same.


45 posted on 04/22/2006 1:14:28 PM PDT by minus_273
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: minus_273

Look if you want to believe that the architectural styles resembles China more than India, its totally up to you, but the fact is we have much more temples (with exactly the same architectural style) on the Indian side as compared to Nepal.


46 posted on 04/22/2006 1:14:31 PM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: minus_273

You can find similar architectural features in temples all over India, and on awider area, in Thailand, Cambodia and much of the rest of SE Asia.


For what it's worth, China isn't exactly anywhere near as diverse as India or the United States, or even Europe, for that matter.


47 posted on 04/22/2006 1:21:05 PM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan
Its not up to me. There is a distinctly indian stlye which is not used much in nepal. at no point have i said the pagoda style is not used in India. I said it is not the style of indian temples. follow that link and look at the ancient temples and tell me they look like nepalese temples .
48 posted on 04/22/2006 1:22:52 PM PDT by minus_273
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

"For what it's worth, China isn't exactly anywhere near as diverse as India or the United States, or even Europe, for that matter."

agreed. i think our discussion of temple styles in india easily establishes that.


49 posted on 04/22/2006 1:24:19 PM PDT by minus_273
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: minus_273

But the contact from India has been far greater than the contact from Tibet.


50 posted on 04/22/2006 1:38:05 PM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: minus_273
 
I dont know what you mean by "Indian" temples but these temples you see here are as much "Indian".
 
 
Buddhist temple in Himachal Pradesh
 
Jokhang Temple in Dharmashala
 
Tibetian Monastery at Ghoom
 

Buddhist temple, japanese style

Buddhist Temples at Bodhgaya

Tawang monastry Arunachal Pradesh

 


51 posted on 04/22/2006 1:45:30 PM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: minus_273

The pagoda architecture went from Nepal to Tibet and finally to China. Remember Arniko.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arniko


52 posted on 04/22/2006 1:46:29 PM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: minus_273

"Nepal is traditionally in the chinese sphere of influence. "

Nepal is NOT in the chinese sphere of influence. Chinese influence on India is ZERO. Nil. Nada. There is Tibetan influence. And Tibetan culture is influenced by Nepali culture, which is derived from Indian culture whether we like India or not.


53 posted on 04/22/2006 1:49:31 PM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: minus_273
More here
 
http://www.stephen-knapp.com/far_northeast_india_photos_group_two.htm
 
Pemayangste-Gangtok
 
Rumtek Monastry
 

 
 
 
Dzogchen monastery in India
 
 
India - Thiksey monastery, Ladakh
Thiksey monastery, Ladakh

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Norbulingka Monastery Dharmashala

Hemis Monastery, Ledakh  Hemis monastry, Ladakh

Buddhist monastry south india.

Phyang  - Leh (Ladakh) India

Phyang Monastry (Ladak) India

Thiksey Monastry, India

Thikse Monastery

Thikse Monastery (India)

Phuktal Monastery

Phuktal Monastery (India)


54 posted on 04/22/2006 2:18:18 PM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: sagar
There is heavy Tibetan influence in Nepal, a good thing for India. Millions of Tibetans live in India, after fleeing the genocidal invasion and occupation of Tibet by the Han Chinese under the PRC. Most Tibetans bitterly resent the Han Chinese, but there are very fewer of them left in Tibet, most have been driven out by Chinese settlers.
55 posted on 04/22/2006 2:19:47 PM PDT by gafusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: sagar

yeah i linked to an article about him earlier.


56 posted on 04/22/2006 2:36:33 PM PDT by minus_273
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: gafusa

especially in Kathmandu valley where the local population (newari) is directly descendent from tibetans


57 posted on 04/22/2006 2:38:41 PM PDT by minus_273
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: sagar

That Tibetan writing looks a lot like that from India too.

Oh, and antoher note to all; the BBC have been reporting on this, lead story on their website about every day lately.


58 posted on 04/22/2006 2:47:46 PM PDT by roadrunner96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: minus_273

Newaris are not directly descendents of Tibetans. People like Sherpas and Bhotiyas are. Newars have far more complex history, since they have lived in Kathmandu(a crossroad) for thousands of years.


59 posted on 04/22/2006 2:50:40 PM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: minus_273

I was there for a while in 92' and they were having problems then. This is a Chinese takeover for sure. The commies are threatening Bhutan too.


60 posted on 04/22/2006 2:53:11 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson