Perhaps there's hope for the moonbats yet.
1 posted on
04/16/2006 3:29:22 AM PDT by
Timeout
To: Timeout
May I propose dumping the waste material for all the new nuclear power plants in her backyard?
2 posted on
04/16/2006 3:32:49 AM PDT by
Nova442
("Cry Havoc and let slip the Dogs of War.")
To: Timeout
hope for the moonbats
No hope--they have created the cult of "global warming" which has spread its wacko meme into every elementary, secondary school and college and into every corner of the federal, state, and local government as well as the wannabe world government (aka the un).
As to the new position on nuclear power--even a broken clock gets the time right twice a day. :-)
3 posted on
04/16/2006 3:37:01 AM PDT by
cgbg
(When you hear the words "gender" or "stakeholder" run for your life!)
To: Timeout
My optimistic side reads this and thinks, "Perhaps the environmentalists are becoming a bit more pragmatic."
But then, my realistic side kicks in and says, "They're only taking this position so that they can support Iran's 'right' to a 'peaceful' nuclear program."
To: Timeout
I read somewhere that the founder of Greenpeace left the group because it became to radical and anti-capitalist. He was a tree-hugging nutjob but not completely off the deep end, IIRC.
5 posted on
04/16/2006 3:41:37 AM PDT by
ko_kyi
To: Timeout
It's about time the simpletons realize there are no easy answers. There are just some answers that make more sense than others. Enriching middle eastern tyrants and allowing them to cripple domestic petroleum production has proven to be far more dangerous than addressing the technical challenges of nuclear energy. Now if they'd just stop the fearmongering over global warming... no chance they have to continue to raise money some way.
6 posted on
04/16/2006 3:46:22 AM PDT by
rhombus
To: Timeout
In the early 1970s when I helped found Greenpeace, I believed that nuclear energy was synonymous with nuclear holocaust, as did most of my compatriots. Sadly, it is too late to undo the damage his ignorance has done to the world and the environment.
9 posted on
04/16/2006 4:06:00 AM PDT by
TN4Liberty
(Sixty percent of all people understand statistics. The other half are clueless.)
To: Timeout
Maybe this guy has realized that no one will accept living in cold, shivering caves wearing only animal skins in order to save his precious Gaia. They'll burn every stick of every tree on the planet, and lynch him from the last standing one before they cut it down, in order to avoid living that way. Maybe a few of these guys have finally gotten smart.
10 posted on
04/16/2006 4:23:04 AM PDT by
Hardastarboard
(Why isn't there an "NRA" for the rest of my rights?)
To: Timeout
Perhaps there's hope for the moonbats yet. I doubt it, however, I think it was Winston Churchill that said: "If you're not a Liberal by the time you are twenty, you don't have a heart. If you're not a Conservative by the time you're forty, you don't have a brain"
To: Timeout
OK, we're all on board. Now, let's do it.
14 posted on
04/16/2006 6:37:24 AM PDT by
Tribune7
To: Temple Owl
15 posted on
04/16/2006 6:38:18 AM PDT by
Tribune7
To: Timeout
nuclear energy may just be the energy source that can save our planet Yet when rational people tried to tell him exactly that 20 years ago, he could do nothing but shout tired slogans and insult their intelligence.
I guess that wising up eventually is better than dying stupid, but it's also too little too late.
16 posted on
04/16/2006 6:51:36 AM PDT by
IronJack
To: Timeout
To: Timeout
![Image hosted by Photobucket.com](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v253/chode6/chode.gif)
bookmark bump...
18 posted on
04/16/2006 7:51:22 AM PDT by
Chode
(1967 UN Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT. American Hedonist ©®)
To: Timeout
Perhaps there's hope for the moonbats yet. This guy isn't a moonbat, he and Greenpeace really parted ways. Greenpeace would rather have us burning dung in fire pits than have any type of Nuclear energy.
19 posted on
04/16/2006 8:22:13 AM PDT by
Mike Darancette
(Proud soldier in the American Army of Occupation..)
To: Timeout
Thanks for posting.
Friends had told me they'd heard some of the enviro-extremists were starting
to relent on their jihad against nuclear power.
You'd think they'd come around earlier seeing how the French are so
committed to nuclear.
20 posted on
04/16/2006 8:24:28 AM PDT by
VOA
To: Timeout
22 posted on
04/16/2006 9:11:11 AM PDT by
aculeus
To: Timeout
Even some of the most entrenched environmentalists have reversed their position on nuclear energy. "My views have changed," wrote Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore in conjunction with Earth Day last week, "and the rest of the environmental movement needs to update its views, too, because nuclear energy may just be the energy source that can save our planet... Every responsible environmentalist should support a move in that direction." Sir......you are all of them!
26 posted on
04/28/2006 11:36:25 AM PDT by
Onelifetogive
(* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson