When that happens I'll let you know. Instead of an irrefutable argument , you said,
"Moreover, you haven't taken time to study time and compare it with quantum mechanics. The evidence in that regard points to an intersection between time and eternity which in turn, is reason to believe anything goes when it comes to history."
How do you argue with someone who says that any claim about the past is as good as any other? I could provide mountains of evidence and you could just wave it aside and say that anything goes when it comes to history. You're impervious to reason.
Are you deeply saddened that the "scientific" ground you stand upon is shakier than you believed? You probably don't even give it a thought because you haven't taken time to look into the scientific study of time and compare it with quantum theory. You're so stuck on yourself and your opinions you think your grip on reality is more solid than rock.
From these two realities - time and quantum mechanics - what you call a miracle may simply be an unusal act of "nature." There is no miracle that could not be explained naturally, because all of nature, including its anomalies, was created and is sustained by an intelligent designer.
But you're right. You do not have an argument with which to seriously refute my point of view. Reality can be explained very well, even scientifically, in view of intelligent design and an Almighty Creator. That is why all you can do is tell yourself intelligent design "is not science." That's fine. Be convinced in your own mind. But don't kid yourself into thinking science has time dialed in and the essence of particle matter figured out.