Posted on 04/15/2006 8:11:03 AM PDT by Hadean
IRAN has said it could defeat any American military action over its controversial nuclear drive, in one of the Islamic regime's boldest challenges yet to the United States.
"You can start a war but it won't be you who finishes it," said General Yahya Rahim Safavi, the head of the Revolutionary Guards and among the regime's most powerful figures.
"The Americans know better than anyone that their troops in the region and in Iraq are vulnerable. I would advise them not to commit such a strategic error," he told reporters on the sidelines of a pro-Palestinian conference in Tehran.
The United States accuses Iran of using an atomic energy drive as a mask for weapons development. Last weekend US news reports said President George W. Bush's administration was refining plans for preventive strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities.
"I would advise them to first get out of their quagmire in Iraq before getting into an even bigger one," General Safavi said with a grin.
"We have American forces in the region under total surveillance. For the past two years, we have been ready for any scenario, whether sanctions or an attack."
Advertisement: Iran announced this week it had successfully enriched uranium to make nuclear fuel, despite a UN Security Council demand for the sensitive work to be halted by April 28.
The Islamic regime says it only wants to generate atomic energy, but enrichment can be extended to make the fissile core of a nuclear warhead -- something the United States is convinced that "axis of evil" member Iran wants to acquire.
At a Friday prayer sermon in Tehran, senior cleric Ayatollah Ahmad Janati simply branded the US as a "decaying power" lacking the "stamina" to block Iran's ambitions.
And hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said that a US push for tough United Nations sanctions was of "no importance".
"She is free to say whatever she wants," the president replied when asked to respond to comments by US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice highlighting part of the UN charter that provides for sanctions backed up by the threat of military action.
"We give no importance to her comments," he said with a broad smile.
On Thursday, Ms Rice said that faced with Iran's intransigence, the United States "will look at the full range of options available to the United Nations".
"There is no doubt that Iran continues to defy the will of the international community," Rice said, after Iran also dismissed a personal appeal from the UN atomic watchdog chief Mohamed ElBaradei.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief must give a report at the end of April on Iranian compliance with the Security Council demand. In Tehran he said that after three years of investigations Iran's activities were "still hazy and not very clear".
Although the United States has been prodding the council to take a tough stand against the Islamic republic, including possible sanctions, it has run into opposition from veto-wielding members Russia and China.
Representatives of the five permanent members of the Security Council plus Germany are to meet in Moscow Tuesday to discuss the crisis.
In seeking to deter international action, Iran has been playing up its oil wealth, its military might in strategic Gulf waters and its influence across the region -- such as in Iraq, Lebanon and the Palestinian territories.
(snip)
I was intrigued by this suggestion in your post. Care to elaborate? Even rank speculation would be welcome :)
When playing poker, you don't raise a bet when all you have is a pair of twos and you know the opponet has something better than you (royal flush). Apparently the Iranian leadership doesn't understand this.
"I would advise them not to commit such a strategic error."
Probably refers to the belief (mostly correct) that US Forces are overextended and there just are no troops available for a ground invasion of Iran. I don't think that's so much a threat as it is the Iranians tipping their hand; they plan (should a ground invasion occur) to either grind us to stalemate or overwhelm us with numbers (even if it means every raghead with a pitchfork must take the field).
They'll then take to the airwaves of Al-Jazeera and CNN and embarrass the Great Satan in European capitals, or perhaps repeat the Somalia debacle and drag our dead soldiers through the streets in front of MSNBC cameras.
I don't think he's alluding to nukes at all (don't get caught up on the word "strategic"), but the concentrated PR campaign which history is showing is the best way to beat a Superpower with a militarily inferior force: let the perpetually (but irrationally) guilty, nervous, and panty-bunched back in the USA win the war for you.
Sometimes I think Nutjob Ahmadinejad is so blatantly whackjob obvious, quite on purpose, all an act, so that he thinks that most of the world won't take him too seriously.. then, on the other hand, suppose he played his Nuclear ambitions close to the vest, and didn't make such wild threats to Israel and US.. acted diplomatically, normal.. how might he be percieved then.
Anybody got the picture of the "Ground Zero Ocean"?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.