Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dimensio

That's a good way to be, and yet I sense you are not comfortable in accepting the mention of intelligent design in a scientific context, even though it might fit the paradigm better than some other general pretext.


387 posted on 04/17/2006 8:15:23 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies ]


To: Fester Chugabrew
That's a good way to be, and yet I sense you are not comfortable in accepting the mention of intelligent design in a scientific context, even though it might fit the paradigm better than some other general pretext.

I am not comfortable in accepting Intelligent Design in a scientific context because thus far it has not demonstrated itself to be scientific. Also, you have not demonstrated that the philosophy that you espouse -- which is not Intelligent Design -- is scientific.
388 posted on 04/17/2006 8:22:42 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson