[Fester Chugabrew]

You are attempting to posit an assumption of your conclusion as a supporting argument for your claim.

It's called an axiom. A starting point. Yes, it could be wrong. No it is not scientifically provable. Do you realize you do the same thing when you attribute the presence of organized matter performing specific functions to anything but intelligent design or agents? It's okay. At some point we all have to assume a conclusion and indulge what is a "logical fallacy," namely a tautology. I don't care to fault you for it, and I know you are capable of sound logic.

[Dimensio]

Do you realize you do the same thing when you attribute the presence of organized matter performing specific functions to anything but intelligent design or agents?

I do not make such an attribution. I draw no conclusions on the matter.