I broke the dam.
Posted on 04/12/2006 1:44:46 PM PDT by Paul Ross
There have been repeated claims that this past year's hurricane activity was another sign of human-induced climate change. Everything from the heat wave in Paris to heavy snows in Buffalo has been blamed on people burning gasoline to fuel their cars, and coal and natural gas to heat, cool and electrify their homes. Yet how can a barely discernible, one-degree increase in the recorded global mean temperature since the late 19th century possibly gain public acceptance as the source of recent weather catastrophes? And how can it translate into unlikely claims about future catastrophes?
(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...
PT Barnum once addressed the phenomenon of people who believe hokum like the global warming voodoo: "There's a sucker born every minute."
Ah, but the Earth has been getting warmer lately. Let's just hope it lasts a bit longer.
http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/ice_ages.html
What kind of idiot would prefer to live on Earth in the midst of an ice age?
We are currently about 18,000 years into an interglacial period (they generally last 15,000 to 20,000 years). Interglacial periods alternate with ice ages, which tend to last about 4-5 times as long.
Before the Earth moved into its current series of ice ages, it was a much warmer place, and capable of supporting much more life than it does today. This series of ice ages will likely continue until we again have open ocean over both poles (a very long time indeed).
It is unlikely that manking will ever be able to significantly affect this cycle. To the extent that we might be able to warm the Earth by increasing the greenhouse effect, it would mostly make the Earth a better place to live (weaker storms, more arable land, etc.)
But there is a more sinister side to this feeding frenzy. Scientists who dissent from the alarmism have seen their grant funds disappear, their work derided, and themselves libeled as industry stooges, scientific hacks or worse. Consequently, lies about climate change gain credence even when they fly in the face of the science that supposedly is their basis.
My deep respect to Richard Lindzen, Michsel Crichton, and all the others who have stood up for real science in the face of organized mass hysteria.
At the risk of offending some people, the true believers of global warming have a pedigree in the Western world. The idea of the "end of the world" occurring through the accumulation of human sin and turning away from God has a strong pull in our culture, including those who profess a lack of belief. True, many environmentalists don't believe in God or accept Jesus as their savior, but they do come out of a culture that has Christianity as its foundation, and that includes the concept of Armaggedon. Global warming is just another horseman. The idea has resonnance, in the same way that nuclear warfare had 40 years ago. For that reason, you're never going to convince the true believers that there is any doubt in the reality and the upcoming horror of global warming - it is based in faith, a faith that says human beings are sinners (polluters) and that our sin is in the process of ruining God's creation (global warming).
True believers make some pretty scary policy decisions once they get in power, too. That's what I'm scared of.
I broke the dam.
Excellent post.
C'mon, you're over reaching a bit with your conjecture.
Global Warming is primarily being pushed by socialists who want to tax those that perform, and transfer wealth to those that don't (through the conduit of enlightened few at the United Nations).
Trying to lay this on the doorstep of Christianity is a crock. Mankind in general is subject to fears (unless they are truly resting on the Rock of Jesus) and these chicken-little socialists are just playing into these fears. When you have Jesus you don't care about 'Global Warming' or 'Global Cooling'. You know who is in charge and you know your mission.
Interesting take on it. The debate is largely over in the scientific community about this and most industrialized nations have signed the Kyota Treaty at the urging of their scientists, not politicians. This is not a political issue, but people stalling on it tend to lump it as such in order to keep their ears closed to all of the evidence. We (humans) are resourceful and can respond to problems like climate change however we want (ie. with different political ideologies).
When you have Jesus you don't care about 'Global Warming' or 'Global Cooling'. You know who is in charge and you know your mission.
And if it isn't shrouded in political grounds, then it is placed in religious terms as an attempt to justify no action. Your implication is that if we are Christians, then we needn't try to solve any problems. But, we were given brains and free will, and we accomplish things by responding to problems. There isn't anything about Global Warming that makes it different from the host of other problems that resourceful people have faced and overcome over the years. If we threw up our hands and said it was out of our power everytime we had faced a problem, then we wouldn't have gotten very far by now.
alas...
Climate of Fear
WSJ Online | 12 Apr 06 | Richard Lindzen
Posted on 04/12/2006 4:07:19 PM EDT by rellimpank
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1613956/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.